Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 8:zjaf091.
doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjaf091. Online ahead of print.

Body mass index and subsequent fracture risk: A meta-analysis to update FRAX®

Nicholas C Harvey  1   2 Helena Johansson  3 Eugene V McCloskey  3   4 Enwu Liu  5 Kristina E Åkesson  6   7 Fred A Anderson  8 Rafael Azagra-Ledesma  9   10   11   12 Cecilie L Bager  13 Charlotte Beaudart  14 Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari  15   16 Emmanuel Biver  17 Olivier Bruyère  18 Jane A Cauley  19 Jacqueline R Center  20   21 Roland Chapurlat  22 Claus Christiansen  13 Cyrus Cooper  1   2   23 Carolyn J Crandall  24 Steven R Cummings  25 José A P da Silva  26   27 Bess Dawson-Hughes  28 Adolfo Diez-Perez  29 Alyssa B Dufour  30   31 John A Eisman  21   32   33 Petra J M Elders  34 Serge Ferrari  17 Yuki Fujita  35 Saeko Fujiwara  36 Claus-Christian Glüer  37 Inbal Goldshtein  38   39 David Goltzman  40 Vilmundur Gudnason  41   42 Jill Hall  43 Didier Hans  44 Mari Hoff  45   46 Rosemary J Hollick  47 Martijn Huisman  48   49 Masayuki Iki  50 Sophia Ish-Shalom  51 Graeme Jones  52 Magnus K Karlsson  6   53 Sundeep Khosla  54 Douglas P Kiel  31   55 Woon-Puay Koh  56   57 Fjorda Koromani  58   59 Mark A Kotowicz  60   61   62 Heikki Kröger  63   64 Timothy Kwok  65   66 Olivier Lamy  67   68 Arnulf Langhammer  69   70 Bagher Larijani  71 Kurt Lippuner  72 Fiona E A McGuigan  6 Dan Mellström  73   74 Thomas Merlijn  34 Tuan V Nguyen  75   76   77 Anna Nordström  78   79   80 Peter Nordström  81 Terence W O'Neill  82   83 Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch  84 Claes Ohlsson  85   86 Eric S Orwoll  87 Julie A Pasco  88   89   90   91 Fernando Rivadeneira  58 Berit Schei  92   93 Anne-Marie Schott  94 Eric J Shiroma  95 Kristin Siggeirsdottir  41   96 Eleanor M Simonsick  97 Elisabeth Sornay-Rendu  98 Reijo Sund  64 Karin M A Swart  99   100 Pawel Szulc  98 Junko Tamaki  101 David J Torgerson  102 Natasja M van Schoor  103   104 Tjeerd P van Staa  105 Joan Vila  106 Nicholas J Wareham  107 Nicole C Wright  108 Noriko Yoshimura  109 M Carola Zillikens  58 Marta Zwart  12   110   111   112 Liesbeth Vandenput  85 Mattias Lorentzon  113   114 William D Leslie  115 John A Kanis  3
Affiliations
Free article

Body mass index and subsequent fracture risk: A meta-analysis to update FRAX®

Nicholas C Harvey et al. J Bone Miner Res. .
Free article

Abstract

The aim of this international meta-analysis was to quantify the predictive value of body mass index (BMI) for incident fracture and relationship of this risk with age, sex, follow-up time and bone mineral density (BMD). 1 667 922 men and women from 32 countries (63 cohorts), followed for a total of 16.0 million person-years were studied. 293 325 had femoral neck BMD measured (2.2 million person-years follow-up). An extended Poisson model in each cohort was used to investigate relationships between WHO-defined BMI categories (Underweight:<18.5 kg/m2; Normal:18.5-24.9 kg/m2; Overweight:25.0-29.9 kg/m2; Obese I:30.0-34.9 kg/m2; Obese II:≥35.0 kg/m2) and risk of incident osteoporotic, major osteoporotic and hip fracture (HF). Inverse-variance weighted β-coefficients were used to merge the cohort-specific results. For the subset with BMD available, in models adjusted for age and follow-up time, the hazard ratio (95%CI) for HF comparing underweight with normal weight was 2.35 (2.10-2.60) in women and for men was 2.45 (1.90-3.17). HF risk was lower in overweight and obese categories compared to normal weight [obese II vs normal: women 0.66 (0.55-0.80); men 0.91 (0.66-1.26). Further adjustment for femoral neck BMD T-score attenuated the increased risk associated with underweight [underweight vs normal: women 1.69 (1.47-1.96); men 1.46 (1.00-2.13)]. In these models, the protective effects of overweight and obesity were attenuated, and in both sexes the direction of association reversed to higher fracture risk in Obese II category [Obese II vs Normal: women 1.24 (0.97-1.58); men 1.70 (1.06-2.75)]. Results were similar for other fracture outcomes. Underweight is a risk factor for fracture in both men and women regardless of adjustment for BMD. However, whilst overweight/obesity appeared protective base models, they became risk factors after additional adjustment for femoral neck BMD, particularly in the Obese II category. This effect in the highest BMI categories was of greater magnitude in men than women. These results will inform the second iteration of FRAX.

Keywords: FRAX; body mass index; epidemiology; hip fracture; major osteoporotic fracture; meta-analysis; osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer