Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Nov 1;117(11):2317-2326.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf198.

Predicting ovarian function loss after chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy in young breast cancer patients

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Predicting ovarian function loss after chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy in young breast cancer patients

Matteo Lambertini et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Background: The ability to predict ovarian function loss after anticancer treatment is important for appropriate oncofertility counseling and to aid in therapy decision-making for young women with early breast cancer (eBC).

Methods: This biomarker analysis of the BETH (NCT00625898) and KAITLIN (NCT01966471) randomized trials investigated anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) use, alone and combined with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol (E2), for predicting ovarian function loss following currently adopted chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy in premenopausal women with HER2-positive eBC. Serum samples were centrally tested measuring AMH, FSH, and E2 using Roche Elecsys assays.

Results: Among 194 included patients (BETH: n = 62; KAITLIN: n = 132), AMH values declined from baseline median 8.44 pmol L-1 to undetectable levels (<0.07 pmol L-1) at the end of therapy, with partial recovery at 36 months (median 0.14 pmol L-1). AMH measured at baseline was predictive of ovarian loss (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.784). Addition of age to AMH slightly improved AUC to 0.800. AMH measured at the end of therapy had AUC 0.741, which increased to 0.785 with addition of age. The combination of AMH at baseline and end of therapy increased prediction to 0.808 and with addition of age to 0.820. Addition of baseline FSH and E2 did not improve prediction in any analysis.

Conclusions: These results support the use of pretreatment measurement of AMH in predicting ovarian function loss in premenopausal women with HER2-positive eBC receiving chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy. Measurement of AMH at the end of treatment had reduced accuracy than pretreatment but in combination added slightly to the value of pretreatment sampling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.L. reported an advisory role for Roche, Lilly, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Seagen, Gilead, MSD, Menarini, Nordic Pharma and Exact Sciences; speaker honoraria from Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Libbs, Daiichi Sankyo, Menarini, and Takeda; travel grants from Gilead, Roche and Daiichi Sankyo; research funding (to the Institution) from Gilead. M.L., who is a JNCI Associate Editor and coauthor of this article, was not involved in the editorial review or decision to publish the article. D.A. and G.B. reported being an employee of Roche Diagnostics International Ltd and a stockholder. R.P.L. reported being an employee of Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany, and Visiting Scientist at the Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology of the Medical Faculty of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Germany. N.H. reported honoraria for lectures and/or consulting: AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen, Viatris, Zuelligpharma. S.M.S. reported an advisory role for Roche/Genentech, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Molecular Templates, Biotheranostics; third party writing Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca; travel from Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech/Roche, Sanofi, Chugai Pharmaceuticals; Board of Directors with stock and stipend from Seagen; Board of Directors with stock options and stipend from Immunome; Scientific Advisory Board for Napo Pharmaceuticals. C.E.G. reported institutional research funding from Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Exact Sciences; travel and accommodation from Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo; advisory board for Exact Sciences. C.L., S.d.H., and E.R. reported being Roche employees and stockholders. I.V.-L. reported speaker or chair honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer/Edimark, Novartis, Sandoz (to the Institution); consulting role for AstraZeneca, Novartis, Resilience (to the Institution); writing engagement from Pfizer/Edimark (to the Institution); research funding from Resilience Care (to the Institution); travel from Novartis. D.A.C. reported research funding from Roche, GSK, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, AstraZeneca, and Synthon (to the Institution). I.E.K. reported research funding/grants from Genentech/Roche, Pfizer and Macrogenics (to the Institution); advisory board participation/consultant and received honoraria from Daiichi/Sankyo, Macrogenics, Genentech/Roche, Seagen, BMS and AstraZeneca; fees for data monitoring board from Novartis and Merck. R.A.A. reported advisory role and research support from Roche. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flow of participants in the BETH and KAITLIN trials to show selection for the present analysis. Abbreviations: AMH = anti-Müllerian hormone; E2 = estradiol; FSH = follicle stimulating hormone.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Distribution of AMH, FSH, E2 at 3 time points for patients between 18 and 45 years of age. Distribution of AMH stratified by time points using original scale (A) and natural logarithm scale (B), FSH (C) and E2 (D). Abbreviations: AMH = anti-Müllerian hormone; E2 = estradiol; FSH = follicle stimulating hormone.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Analysis of diagnostic and predictive value of AMH for premature ovarian insufficiency at different time points. (A) AMH levels at 36 months in women with and without POI, and ROC analysis for diagnostic accuracy at that time point. (B) Predictive value of pretreatment AMH for POI at 36 months, AMH levels at pretreatment in women with and without POI at 36 months, and ROC analysis for predictive accuracy at pretreatment. (C) Predictive value of AMH at the end of treatment for POI at 36 months, AMH levels at the end of treatment in women with and without POI at 36 months, and ROC analysis for predictive accuracy at the end of treatment. Abbreviations: AMH = anti-Müllerian hormone; POI = premature ovarian insufficiency; ROC = receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
(A) Distribution of baseline AMH and age for development of premature ovarian insufficiency at 36 months. Blue symbols indicate women who developed POI, red symbols indicate women who did not. (B) Results of model for baseline AMH (log scale) against risk of POI at 36 months for a range of exemplar ages. Abbreviations: AMH = anti-Müllerian hormone; POI = premature ovarian insufficiency .

Comment in

References

    1. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:12-49. - PubMed
    1. Paluch-Shimon S, Cardoso F, Partridge AH, et al. ESO-ESMO fifth international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY5). Ann Oncol. 2022;33:1097-1118. - PubMed
    1. Ruddy KJ, Gelber SI, Tamimi RM, et al. Prospective study of fertility concerns and preservation strategies in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1151-1156. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blondeaux E, Massarotti C, Fontana V, et al. The PREgnancy and FERtility (PREFER) study investigating the need for ovarian function and/or fertility preservation strategies in premenopausal women with early breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:690320. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lambertini M, Peccatori FA, Demeestere I, et al. Fertility preservation and post-treatment pregnancies in post-pubertal cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1664-1678. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms