Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Aug 12;25(1):841.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07967-5.

The role of statins during pregnancy on maternal risk of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The role of statins during pregnancy on maternal risk of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pantea Khalili et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, characterized by angiogenic imbalance and systemic dysfunction after 20 weeks of gestation. Statins, particularly pravastatin, have showed potential in prevention due to their anti-inflammatory and endothelial-protective properties, though safety in pregnancy remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of statins and their association with maternal risk of preeclampsia.

Methods: Two independent reviewers systematically searched data from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase databases until December 2024 for studies evaluating statins for prevention of pre-eclampsia. Those healthy pregnant women who did not develop preeclampsia were assessed as comparators. Letters, comments, case reports, and reviews were excluded. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used for assessing case-control and cohort studies. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) were adopted for evaluating randomized trials. The primary outcome was preeclampsia. Secondary outcomes included the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), preterm labor (PTB), neonatal birth defects, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. The random-effects method (REM) or fixed-effects method (FEM) were employed depending on the heterogeneity. Sub-group analysis was performed to identify the source of heterogeneity. The publication bias was assessed via the funnel plot, Egger's and Begg's tests. The leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were also performed. The RevMan 5.3 and Stata 16.0 were the main software used for data extraction and analysis.

Results: 11 different studies covering 10,482 pregnant participants, with 456 diagnosed with preeclampsia. Results showed a pooled risk ratio (RR) of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.33 to 1.83, p = 0.57), indicating that statin use during pregnancy was not significantly associated with a reduced risk of preeclampsia. Heterogeneity among studies was high (I² = 94%, p < 0.05), suggesting variability in study populations, dosages, and statin types. The second outcomes also showed insignificant statistical difference. Sub-group analysis implied early initiation of statins may reduce preeclampsia risk during pregnancy. Sensitivity analysis revealed that no single study had significant impact on the overall effect.

Conclusion: Due to significant heterogeneity, current evidence is insufficient to establish a definitive protective role for statins in preventing preeclampsia during pregnancy. While subgroup findings suggest that early initiation may be associated with reduced risk, these observations should be interpreted with caution and require confirmation in future high-quality trials.

Trial registration: The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42024601996).

Keywords: Gestational hypertension; Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; Preeclampsia; Pregnancy complication; Statins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The PRISMA flow chart of the selection process of included studies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of relative risk (RR) for the association between statin use and maternal risk of preeclampsia
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot of relative risk (RR) for the association between statin use and maternal risk of preterm birth (PTB)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot of relative risk (RR) for the association between statin use and maternal risk of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot of relative risk (RR) for the association between statin use and neonatal birth defects after delivery
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The funnel plot to assess publication bias

Similar articles

References

    1. Dimitriadis E, Rolnik DL, Zhou W, Estrada-Gutierrez G, Koga K, Francisco RPV, Whitehead C, Hyett J, da Silva Costa F, Nicolaides K, et al. Pre-eclampsia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2023;9(1):8. - PubMed
    1. Li C, Tian Y, Dougarem D, Sun L, Zhong Z. Systemic inflammatory regulators and preeclampsia: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Front Genet. 2024;15:1359579. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Melchiorre K, Giorgione V, Thilaganathan B. The placenta and preeclampsia: villain or victim? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(2S):S954–62. - PubMed
    1. Provinciatto H, Barbalho ME, Almeida J, Provinciatto A, Philip CE. The role of Pravastatin in preventing preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024;6(2):101260. - PubMed
    1. Gajzlerska-Majewska W, Bomba-Opon DA, Wielgos M. Is pravastatin a milestone in the prevention and treatment of preeclampsia? J Perinat Med. 2018;46(8):825–31. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources