Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-segment cervical degenerative disc disease with a minimum of 4-year follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 40797275
- PMCID: PMC12344910
- DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-06189-x
Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-segment cervical degenerative disc disease with a minimum of 4-year follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Objective: Our aim was to evaluate long-term effectiveness and safety of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in single-segment cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD).
Methods: Comprehensive literature searches were performed in four databases from their inception until February 6, 2025. Meta-analyses were conducted with use of Stata 17.0.
Results: Seventeen randomized controlled trials were included in our meta-analysis. CDA group exhibited greater blood loss but demonstrated a higher neurological success rate, an increased range of motion, and lower scores on neck disability index as well as visual analog scales. Additionally, reoperation rates and adjacent segment degeneration rates were significantly reduced in comparison to ACDF group. There were no significant differences between two groups in surgical duration or adverse event rates.
Conclusion: In the long term, cervical disc arthroplasty presents favorable safety profile for treating single-segment CDDD with lower reoperation rates while demonstrating superior efficacy over ACDF along with effective reduction in adjacent segment degeneration rates.
Keywords: Cervical degenerative disc disease; Cervical disc arthroplasty; Long-term efficacy; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trial.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable in this section. Consent for publication: Not applicable in this section. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures













Similar articles
-
Effect of device constraint: a comparative network meta-analysis of ACDF and cervical disc arthroplasty.Spine J. 2024 Oct;24(10):1858-1871. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.016. Epub 2024 Jun 4. Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38843960
-
Comparison of outcomes between cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Neurosurg Spine. 2025 Apr 4;42(6):705-717. doi: 10.3171/2024.12.SPINE24623. Print 2025 Jun 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2025. PMID: 40184678
-
Polyurethane on titanium unconstrained disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc disease: a review of level I-II randomized clinical trials including clinical outcomes.Eur Spine J. 2015 Dec;24(12):2735-45. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4228-z. Epub 2015 Sep 12. Eur Spine J. 2015. PMID: 26363559
-
Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Eight Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials.PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0149312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149312. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26872258 Free PMC article.
-
Total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review with meta-analysis of data from a total of 3160 patients across 14 randomized controlled trials with both short- and medium- to long-term outcomes.Bone Joint J. 2018 Aug;100-B(8):991-1001. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2018-0120.R1. Bone Joint J. 2018. PMID: 30062947
References
-
- Buchbinder R, van Tulder M, Öberg B, Costa LM, Woolf A, Schoene M, et al. Low back pain: a call for action. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2384–8. - PubMed
-
- Knezevic NN, Candido KD, Vlaeyen JWS, Van Zundert J, Cohen SP. Low back pain. Lancet. 2021;398(10294):78–92. - PubMed
-
- Sharma P, Hughes S, El Haj A, Maffulli N. Expression of the two pore domain potassium channel TREK-1 in human intervertebral disc cells. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2012;7(4):266–71. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical