Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 7;8(4):ooaf076.
doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf076. eCollection 2025 Aug.

A community-based approach to ethical decision-making in artificial intelligence for health care

Affiliations
Review

A community-based approach to ethical decision-making in artificial intelligence for health care

Abdou S Senghor et al. JAMIA Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare by improving diagnostics, treatment recommendations, and resource allocation. However, its implementation also raises ethical concerns, particularly regarding biases in AI algorithms trained on inequitable data, which may reinforce health disparities. This article introduces the AI COmmunity-based Ethical Dialogue and DEcision-making (CODE) framework to embed ethical deliberation into AI development, focusing on Electronic Health Records (EHRs).

Materials and methods: We propose the AI CODE framework as a structured approach to addressing ethical challenges in AI-driven healthcare and ensuring its implementation supports health equity.

Results: The framework outlines 5 steps to advance health equity: (1) Contextual diversity and priority: Ensuring inclusive datasets and that AI reflects the community needs; (2) Sharing ethical propositions: Structured discussions on privacy, bias, and fairness; (3) Dialogic decision-making: Collaboratively with stakeholders to develop AI solutions; (4) Integrating ethical solutions: Applying solutions into AI design to enhance fairness; and (5) Evaluating effectiveness: Continuously monitoring AI to address emerging biases.

Discussion: We examine the framework's role in mitigating AI biases through structured community engagement and its relevance within evolving healthcare policies. While the framework promotes ethical AI integration in healthcare, it also faces challenges in implementation.

Conclusion: The framework provides practical guidance to ensure AI systems are ethical, community-driven, and aligned with health equity goals.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; community involvement; decision making; electronic health record data; health care ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None reported.

References

    1. Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23:689. 10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maleki Varnosfaderani S, Forouzanfar M. The role of AI in hospitals and clinics: transforming healthcare in the 21st century. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024;11:337. 10.3390/bioengineering11040337. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Capraro V, Lentsch A, Acemoglu D, et al. The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making. PNAS Nexus. 2024;3:pgae191. 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae191. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marko JGO, Neagu CD, Anand PB. Examining inclusivity: the use of AI and diverse populations in health and social care: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025;25:57. 10.1186/s12911-025-02884-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson HM, Sharma B, Bhalla S, et al. Bias and fairness assessment of a natural language processing opioid misuse classifier: detection and mitigation of electronic health record data disadvantages across racial subgroups. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28:2393-2403. 10.1093/jamia/ocab148. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources