Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 29:12:1602027.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1602027. eCollection 2025.

Identifying stakeholders and analyzing their concerns about African swine fever control in wild boar

Affiliations

Identifying stakeholders and analyzing their concerns about African swine fever control in wild boar

Janine Miesch et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) is approaching Switzerland as it continues to spread across Europe. This viral disease affects porcine species, leading to severe economic losses when reaching the domestic pig sector. Controlling ASF in wild boar populations is complex and requires coordination among diverse stakeholders with varying roles and interests. We used a participatory approach in data generation (including desk research, qualitative interviews, focus group discussions, and workshops) and applied reflexive thematic analysis to systematically identify relevant actors and assess their concerns, guided by the Mendelow Power-Interest Grid for stakeholder mapping. Results reveal a broad spectrum of stakeholders, including federal and cantonal-level authorities, the private industry sector, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and private individuals, as well as academic and diagnostic institutions. Stakeholder mapping underscores the central role of federal and cantonal authorities in ASF control and demonstrates the hunting sector's dual position as both being impacted by and being actively involved in control efforts. Stakeholders' concerns fall into five key areas: economic risk, material shortages, legal frameworks and bureaucratic obstacles, challenges in communication and coordination, and animal welfare and environmental issues. Findings emphasize the need for improved governance, clearer guidelines, and stronger coordination among federal and cantonal authorities. The research demonstrates the value of participatory approaches for disease management by enhancing collaboration, identifying critical gaps, and strengthening preparedness and response efforts, on the example of ASF in Switzerland.

Keywords: ASF; crisis management; participatory research; stakeholder analysis; veterinary public health; wild boar management; wildlife disease control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stakeholder power-interest mapping according to Mendelow. The figure illustrates the mapping framework of stakeholders involved in the control of future African swine fever in wild boar in Switzerland based on their power and interest. Relative proximity to the axes reflects an estimated strength of stakeholder power or interest. To enhance clarity and simplify the presentation, some stakeholders were grouped under broader categories in the illustration, such as “Academia and Research,” which encompasses diverse institutions including the Vetsuisse Faculty, the Geneva School of Landscape, Engineering and Architecture, the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research among others. FSVO, Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office; FOEN, Federal Office for the Environment; IVI, Institute of Virology and Immunology; FOAG, Federal Office for Agriculture; FEDRO, Federal Roads Office; FOCP, Federal Office for Civil Protection; FOCS, Federal Office for Civilian Service.

Similar articles

References

    1. EFSA . Animal Diseases ASFV. Geographical distribution. (2025). Available online at: https://animal-diseases.efsa.europa.eu/ASFV/#Geographicaldistribution (accessed January 30, 2025).
    1. Niemi JK. Impacts of African swine fever on Pigmeat Markets in Europe. Front Vet Sci. (2020) 7:634. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00634, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sauter-Louis C, Conraths FJ, Probst C, Blohm U, Schulz K, Sehl J, et al. African swine fever in wild boar in Europe—a review. Viruses. (2021) 13:1717. doi: 10.3390/v13091717, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Commission . The strategic approach to the Management of African Swine Fever for the EU. (2020). Available online at: https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-04/ad_control-measures_asf_w... (accessed January 30, 2025).
    1. Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office . African swine fever. (2025). Available online at: https://www.blv.admin.ch/blv/en/home/tiere/tierseuchen/uebersicht-seuche... (accessed January 30, 2025).

LinkOut - more resources