Addressing family communication in genetic counseling: A scoping review of process studies
- PMID: 40801425
- PMCID: PMC12345395
- DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.70067
Addressing family communication in genetic counseling: A scoping review of process studies
Abstract
Process studies explore the content and dynamics established during genetic counseling (GC), allowing a greater understanding of what happens. No literature review has specifically examined how family communication of genetic information has been addressed in GC process studies. To fill this gap, a scoping review was conducted. Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycInfo were searched, resulting in 21 articles for analysis. Most studies were retrospective (n = 19) and qualitative (n = 15) and involved hereditary cancer syndromes (n = 13). Studies analyzed how family communication of genetic information is addressed in GC by either focusing on patients' experiences and perspectives, or genetic healthcare professionals' (GHP) roles and scope of practice. All studies reported that GHP address family communication with patients, but their practices were heterogeneous and influenced by contextual factors. Practices to address family communication included providing guidance to inform the family (n = 19), materials to support communication (n = 16), psychosocial assessment (n = 11), and additional support (n = 18). Our findings suggest that the approach to family communication in GC draws on both teaching and counseling models, although with greater emphasis on the former. This is consistent with integrated models of GC. Future prospective process studies using observational data could enhance our understanding of patient-professional interactions and their influence on patient decision-making regarding family communication of genetic information.
Keywords: family disclosure; genetic counseling; genetic risk; literature review; psychosocial genetics.
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Genetic Counseling published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Society of Genetic Counselors.
Conflict of interest statement
All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314
-
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35802350 Free PMC article.
-
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40232221 Free PMC article.
-
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27536798
References
-
- Aasen, T. , & Skolbekken, J.‐A. (2014). Preparing for and communicating uncertainty in cancer genetic counselling sessions in Norway: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health, Risk and Society, 16(4), 370–389. 10.1080/13698575.2014.927838 - DOI
-
- Afaya, A. , Kim, S. W. , Park, H. S. , Lim, M. C. , Jung, M. S. , Nam, E. J. , Park, J. S. , Jeong, J. , Ryu, J. M. , Kim, J. S. , Kim, J. , Kim, M. , Jin, J. , Han, J. , Kim, S. Y. , Park, S. Y. , Katapodi, M. C. , Kim, S. , & the K‐CASCADE consortium . (2024). Psychosocial barriers and facilitators for cascade genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: A scoping review. Familial Cancer, 23(2), 121–132. 10.1007/s10689-024-00379-y - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ahsan, M. D. , Levi, S. R. , Webster, E. M. , Bergeron, H. , Lin, J. , Narayan, P. , Nelson, B. B. , Li, X. , Fowlkes, R. K. , Brewer, J. T. , Thomas, C. , Christos, P. J. , Chapman‐Davis, E. , Cantillo, E. , Holcomb, K. , Sharaf, R. N. , & Frey, M. K. (2023). Do people with hereditary cancer syndromes inform their at‐risk relatives? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. PEC Innovation, 2, 100138. 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100138 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Aromataris, E. , Lockwood, C. , Porritt, K. , Pilla, B. , & Jordan, Z. (2024). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. 10.46658/JBIMES-24-01 - DOI
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous