Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 13.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05159-5. Online ahead of print.

Diagnostic and clinical utility of ultrasound elastography for uterine cervical neoplasms-a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Diagnostic and clinical utility of ultrasound elastography for uterine cervical neoplasms-a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Fatemeh Mahdavi Sabet et al. Abdom Radiol (NY). .

Abstract

Purpose: Cervical cancer remains a major burden, especially in low-resource settings, due to limited screening. Traditional diagnostic tools, like colposcopy, are operator-dependent and often lack accuracy. Ultrasound elastography, including strain elastography (SE) and shear wave elastography (SWE), is a cost-effective, non-invasive tool for assessing tissue stiffness, aiding in distinguishing benign from malignant cervical lesions, and monitoring treatment. This review evaluates elastography's diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility in cervical cancer management.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42025639380). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to January 2025 for studies utilizing elastography in cervical cancer. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and SROC curves were calculated using R software and Stata, with heterogeneity and publication bias evaluated.

Results: A total of twenty-three studies were included, with 19 in the meta-analysis. Elastography demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for both detecting cervical cancer (sensitivity 88.3%, specificity 92%, AUC 0.965) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). SE trended to a non-significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than SWE (p = 0.51). Quantitative parameters differentiated cervical cancer from controls (SMD = 2.59, p < 0.001) and CIN (SMD = 1.75, p = 0.015). Elastography can effectively assess treatment response and tumor invasion.

Conclusion: Elastography aids cervical cancer diagnosis with high sensitivity and specificity, ideal for resource-limited settings due to its affordability and safety. Standardized training and guidelines are needed for consistent use. Future studies should compare SE and SWE, minimize variability, benchmark against MRI, and assess prognostic value.

Keywords: Cervical cancer; Elastography; Meta-analysis; Shear wave elastography; Strain ratio; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sun P, Yu C, Yin L, Chen Y, Sun Z, Zhang T, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of female cancers in women of child-bearing age, 1990–2021: analysis of data from the global burden of disease study 2021. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;74:102713. - PubMed - PMC
    1. World Health Organization. Cervical cancer. 2024 [cited 2025 Feb 23]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cervical-cancer .
    1. Wu J, Jin Q, Zhang Y, Ji Y, Li J, Liu X, et al. Global burden of cervical cancer: current estimates, temporal trend and future projections based on the GLOBOCAN 2022. Journal of the National Cancer Center. 2025;5(3):322–9. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Cao L, Shen P, Wei M, Du W, Lu X. Application of Shear Wave Elastography in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Cervical Cancer. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024;51(9):203.
    1. Massad LS, Collins YC. Strength of correlations between colposcopic impression and biopsy histology. Gynecologic Oncology. 2003;89(3):424–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources