Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 13.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05141-1. Online ahead of print.

A nomogram based on MR radiomics and MR sign score for prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders and risk assessment of adverse clinical outcomes

Affiliations

A nomogram based on MR radiomics and MR sign score for prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders and risk assessment of adverse clinical outcomes

Mengzhe Zuo et al. Abdom Radiol (NY). .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical value of a nomogram integrating placental MR radiomics features, MR sign scores, and clinical indicators for prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders (PAS) and risk assessment of adverse clinical outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed clinical and imaging data from 167 pregnant women (89 PAS cases, 78 non-PAS) randomly allocated into training (n = 119) and validation (n = 48) sets. Subjective MR signs were evaluated to establish an MR scoring system. Radiomics features were extracted from two sequences. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm selected features to construct a radiomics model, generating a radiomics score (Radscore). Multivariate logistic regression combined clinical indicators, MR scores, and Radscore to develop joint prediction models. Model performance was assessed using ROC curves, bootstrap validation, and decision curve analysis. The optimal model was visualized as a nomogram (Nomoscore), which was further evaluated for PAS subtype differentiation and adverse outcome prediction.

Results: Among all models, the combined model incorporating induced abortion number, MR scores, and Radscore demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, achieving AUCs of 0.857 (95% CI: 0.792 ~ 0.922) and 0.848 (95% CI: 0.74 ~ 0.956) in the training and validation sets, respectively. At a threshold > 0.452, this outperformed standalone models (MR score, clinical model, clinical-MR score model, radiomics model; Z values were 2.764, 3.218, 2.470, 2.213, all p < 0.05). The nomogram effectively differentiated placenta accreta (PA) from placenta increta (PI) (AUC = 0.837, 95% CI: 0.769 ~ 0.905) and PI from placenta percreta (PP) (AUC = 0.879, 95% CI: 0.807 ~ 0.951), while predicting adverse outcomes with an AUC of 0.822 (95% CI: 0.753 ~ 0.891) at optimal thresholds (> 0.628, > 0.966, and > 0.710, respectively). Decision curve analysis confirmed higher clinical net benefit compared to alternative models.

Conclusion: The nomogram integrating MR radiomics, MR signs, and induced abortion number offers potential clinical utility for prenatal PAS diagnosis, subtype classification, and risk stratification of adverse outcomes.

Keywords: Adverse clinical outcomes; MR scoring system; Nomogram; Placenta accreta spectrum disorders; Radiomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee, and each subject signed an “Informed Consent about MRI.” The study was carried out in accordance with the applicable guidelines and regulations. Consent for publication: Not applicable.

Similar articles

References

    1. Jauniaux E, Bhide A, Kennedy A, et al (2018) FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Prenatal diagnosis and screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 140:274–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12408 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hobson S R, Kingdom J C, Murji A, et al (2019) No. 383-Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 41:1035–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.12.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shamshirsaz A A, Fox K A, Salmanian B, et al (2015) Maternal morbidity in patients with morbidly adherent placenta treated with and without a standardized multidisciplinary approach. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 212:211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.019 - DOI
    1. Jha P, Poder L, Bourgioti C, et al (2020) Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) and European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) joint consensus statement for MR imaging of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Eur Radiol 30:2604–2615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06617-7 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eller A G, Bennett M A, Sharshiner M, et al (2011) Maternal Morbidity in Cases of Placenta Accreta Managed by a Multidisciplinary Care Team Compared With Standard Obstetric Care. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2011,117. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182051db2

LinkOut - more resources