German S3 guideline on implant-supported all-ceramic restorations
- PMID: 40802222
- PMCID: PMC12350975
- DOI: 10.1186/s40729-025-00641-7
German S3 guideline on implant-supported all-ceramic restorations
Abstract
Purpose: With increasing demand for aesthetic, metal-free restorations, all-ceramic materials have gained popularity in implant prosthodontics. However, questions regarding their long-term performance, material selection, and design features remain unresolved. This guideline, developed by the German Association of Oral Implantology (DGI) in collaboration with the German Society of Dentistry and Oral Medicine (DGZMK), aims to enhance treatment safety, guide clinical decision-making, and improve patient education concerning all-ceramic implant-supported restorations.
Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of all-ceramic restorations in three main indications: implant-supported single crowns, short-span fixed dental prostheses, and full-arch restorations. Recommendations were developed based on the quality of evidence or expert consensus.
Results: For single crowns, lithium disilicate, silicate ceramics, and all generations of zirconia demonstrated favorable 3-year survival rates (~ 96-97%). In contrast, polymer-infiltrated ceramics showed inferior performance and were not recommended. For short-span FDPs and full-arch reconstructions, only 3Y-TZP zirconia is supported by clinical evidence. Micro-veneering and monolithic designs reduce chipping risks. Patient education is emphasized due to limited evidence for newer materials and full-arch restorations.
Conclusions: All-ceramic implant restorations can be successfully implemented with careful material selection, adherence to bonding protocols, and appropriate prosthetic design. However, clinical limitations persist, especially in full-arch indications. Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to optimize outcomes and minimize complications.
Keywords: All-ceramic; Bridge; Consensus; Crown; Evidence-based dentistry; FDP; Full-arch; Guideline; Implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis; Prosthodontics.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Metal-free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 20;12(12):CD009606. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009606.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29261853 Free PMC article.
-
The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review.J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Jun;42(6):467-80. doi: 10.1111/joor.12272. Epub 2015 Jan 10. J Oral Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 25580846
-
Clinical outcomes of all-ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prostheses supported by ceramic implants: A systematic review and meta-analyses.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jan;33(1):1-20. doi: 10.1111/clr.13871. Epub 2021 Nov 5. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022. PMID: 34665900 Free PMC article.
-
All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs).Dent Mater. 2015 Jun;31(6):603-23. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Apr 2. Dent Mater. 2015. PMID: 25842099
-
The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review.BMC Oral Health. 2017 Sep 19;17(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0415-0. BMC Oral Health. 2017. PMID: 28927393 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Waltenberger L, Wolfart S. In: DGI D, editor. Vollkeramische festsitzende implantatgetragene restaurationen. Germany: AWMF; 2024. p. 117.
-
- Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):401–6. - PubMed
-
- Jokstad A, Pjetursson BE, Mühlemann S, Wismeijer D, Wolfart S, Fehmer V et al. Fabrication, workflow and delivery of reconstruction: Summary and consensus statements of group 4. The 6th EAO Consensus Conference 2021. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32 Suppl 21:336– 41. - PubMed
-
- Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Latyshev A, Rabel K, Kohal RJ, Karasan D. A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(Suppl 21):254–88. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Zhang Y, Wei D, Tian J, Zhao Y, Lin Y, Di P. Clinical evaluation and quantitative occlusal change analysis of posterior implant-supported all-ceramic crowns: A 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023;34(11):1188–97. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources