Cone Beam Computed Tomography Based Finite Element Analysis of Bone-Implant Constructs and Comparison with Experimental Measurements
- PMID: 40802268
- DOI: 10.1115/1.4069393
Cone Beam Computed Tomography Based Finite Element Analysis of Bone-Implant Constructs and Comparison with Experimental Measurements
Abstract
The biomechanical environment around implants plays a crucial role in the stability and success of dental implants. In our previous studies, laboratory-based micro X-ray computed tomography (micro-CT) was used to conduct in situ biomechanical experiments and finite element method (FEM) analyses of bone-implant biomechanics. Compared to micro-CT, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is more commonly used in dental clinics. This study uses CBCT to investigate peri-implant bone biomechanics. Voxel-based finite element models were constructed from CBCT images of five human cadaveric bone-tooth specimens. The 3D strain distribution in bone surrounding immediately loaded implants was computed and quantitatively compared with experimental results. Our findings revealed significant strain concentration at bone-implant contact (BIC) areas (greater than 0.8%), extending to both buccal and lingual bone plates. Notably, the thinner buccal plate exhibited greater strain concentration (greater than 0.8%) than the thicker lingual plate (approximately 0.6%). The comparison of FEM-computed averaged maximum principal strain values and experimental results showed good agreement for both buccal (slope 0.892, R-squared 0.9607) and lingual plates (slope 1.0965, R-squared 0.9633). However, CBCT-based FEM overestimated strain at BIC locations by a factor of 1.7. CBCT-based FEM is effective in predicting strain in both buccal and lingual plates. This strain concentration in the buccal plate may contribute to observed buccal bone resorption. Insights from this work could inform development of biomechanics-guided preclinical assessments and CBCT-based implant planning.
Copyright © 2025 by ASME.
Similar articles
-
Volumetric buccal bone alterations at immediate implant sites with or without soft tissue augmentation: A 6-month assessment.J Periodontol. 2025 Aug 10. doi: 10.1002/jper.11381. Online ahead of print. J Periodontol. 2025. PMID: 40785129
-
Immediate versus delayed single-tooth implant placement in bony defect sockets in the aesthetic zone: Is an intact buccal wall necessary?Evid Based Dent. 2025 Jun;26(2):80-82. doi: 10.1038/s41432-025-01152-5. Epub 2025 May 13. Evid Based Dent. 2025. PMID: 40360820
-
Dental photon-counting computed tomography for the assessment of Peri-Implant structures.Int J Implant Dent. 2025 Aug 9;11(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40729-025-00640-8. Int J Implant Dent. 2025. PMID: 40782315 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Micro-computed Tomography in Dental Implant Osseointegration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Acad Radiol. 2025 Feb;32(2):1086-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.011. Epub 2024 Oct 5. Acad Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39368915
-
Adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for treating periodontal and peri-implant diseases.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 12;7(7):CD011778. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011778.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38994711 Free PMC article.