Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep-Oct;39(5):e70198.
doi: 10.1111/jvim.70198.

Antibiograms of Bacterial Cultures From Equine Neonates at a United Kingdom Hospital: 381 Samples (2018-2023)

Affiliations

Antibiograms of Bacterial Cultures From Equine Neonates at a United Kingdom Hospital: 381 Samples (2018-2023)

Annabelle E Graham et al. J Vet Intern Med. 2025 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: Geographical specific data is required to guide empirical antimicrobial selection in equine neonates.

Objectives: Evaluate antibiograms and survival in foals from a United Kingdom (UK)-based hospital to guide antimicrobial selection.

Animals: Blood and synovial fluid samples from 208 foals ≤ 30 days old admitted to Rossdales Equine Hospital from 2018 to 2023.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed by disc diffusion method. Bacterial culture and susceptibility and foal survival were recorded. The effects of the presence of positive culture or multidrug resistance (MDR) isolates on survival were evaluated using univariable mixed effects logistic regression.

Results: Ninety-one isolates were identified from 381 samples from 208 foals. Predominantly gram-positive (75%, 68/91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 65%-83%) isolates were identified, and Enterococcus (26%, 24/91; 95% CI: 18%-37%) was the most commonly isolated bacteria. MDR was identified in 21% of isolates (19/91; 95% CI: 13%-31%). Enterococcus was the most frequent MDR isolate (7/19). The combination of ampicillin and amikacin showed in vitro susceptibility in 90% (81/90; 95% CI: 82%-95%) of aerobic isolates. In total, 87% of foals were discharged from the hospital (180/208; 95% CI: 81%-91%). No association was identified between survival and the presence of positive culture or MDR isolates.

Main limitations: Retrospective design; missing data for prior antimicrobial treatment, reason for admission and admission variables.

Conclusions and clinical importance: Ampicillin and amikacin are appropriate combination first-line antimicrobial treatments in this population. Many Gram-positive isolates were identified, most notably Enterococcus. Culture and susceptibility guided antimicrobial choices remain crucial, especially given the unpredictable susceptibility of Enterococcus and the frequency of MDR Enterococcus isolates identified.

Keywords: antimicrobials; culture; foal; resistance; susceptibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This retrospective paper discusses the susceptibility testing of amoxicillin, piperacillin and tazobactam, clarithromycin, ceftriaxone, amikacin, rifampicin, doxycycline, ampicillin, ticarcillin and clavulanic acid, erythromycin, cefotaxime, azithromycin, cefquinome, and marbofloxacin but not used in the study.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart of enrolled samples and results of bacterial culture for aerobic or anaerobic followed by Gram status.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Bar chart showing the proportion of samples tested in each year of the study that yielded Gram‐positive or Gram‐negative isolates or without bacterial growth identified in each year. The numbers reported within each column are the absolute number of samples.

Similar articles

References

    1. Giguère S., Weber E. J., and Sanchez L. C., “Factors Associated With Outcome and Gradual Improvement in Survival Over Time in 1065 Equine Neonates Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit,” Equine Veterinary Journal 49, no. 1 (2017): 45–50, 10.1111/evj.12536. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Theelen M. J. P., Wilson W. D., Byrne B. A., Edman J. M., Kass P. H., and Magdesian K. G., “Initial Antimicrobial Treatment of Foals With Sepsis: Do Our Choices Make a Difference?,” Veterinary Journal 243 (2019): 74–76, 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.11.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Floyd E. F., Easton‐Jones C. A., and Theelen M. J. P., “Systemic Antimicrobial Therapy in Foals,” Equine Veterinary Education 34, no. 1 (2022): 49–56, 10.1111/eve.13467. - DOI
    1. Theelen M. J. P., Wilson W. D., Byrne B. A., et al., “Differences in Isolation Rate and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacteria Isolated From Foals With Sepsis at Admission and After ≥48 Hours of Hospitalization,” Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 34, no. 2 (2020): 955–963, 10.1111/jvim.15692. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilson A., Mair T., Williams N., McGowan C., and Pinchbeck G., “Antimicrobial Prescribing and Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Equine Practice,” Equine Veterinary Journal 55, no. 3 (2023): 494–505, 10.1111/evj.13587. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources