Clinical and economic research of bone modifiers as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer: A systematic literature review
- PMID: 40803152
- PMCID: PMC12359659
- DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104551
Clinical and economic research of bone modifiers as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer: A systematic literature review
Abstract
Background: Adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy is recommended by some guidelines for postmenopausal breast cancer, but its application is not ideal due to inconsistent study results and economic burden considerations. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of bone modifiers in breast cancer adjuvant treatment to inform clinical practice and health policy.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched using terms related to bone modifiers and breast cancer. The included studies comprised clinical trials evaluating adjuvant bone modifiers in early breast cancer (EBC) that reported recurrence, metastasis, or survival outcomes, as well as economic studies that reported costs and effects. Quality was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Quality of Health Economic Studies scale. We also summarized current international guideline recommendations regarding adjuvant bone modifiers in EBC.
Results: Of the 31 eligible articles, findings showed that zoledronic acid and clodronate demonstrated reduced recurrence and improved survival in low-estrogen EBC patients, whereas ibandronate showed no significant benefit. Other bisphosphonates and denosumab require further investigation. Bone modifiers were generally well-tolerated, with mild adverse events. Serious events like nephrotoxicity, osteonecrosis of the jaw, and atypical femoral fractures were rare but necessitate monitoring and prevention. Economic studies suggest that adjuvant zoledronic acid may be cost-effective for postmenopausal EBC patients.
Conclusion: Many unresolved issues remain regarding bone modifiers in EBC adjuvant therapy. Insufficient clinical and economic evidence precludes drawing comprehensive conclusions at present. Future studies need to provide higher-quality evidence to deepen our understanding of adjuvant therapy with bone modifiers.
Keywords: Adjuvant therapy; Bisphosphonates; Bone modifiers; Breast cancer; Denosumab.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021;71:209–249. - PubMed
-
- Liang Y., Zhang H., Song X., Yang Q. Metastatic heterogeneity of breast cancer: molecular mechanism and potential therapeutic targets. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;60:14–27. - PubMed
-
- Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology] 2021;43:622–628. [Expert consensus on safety management of bone-modifying agents] - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources