Optimizing mobile app design for older adults: systematic review of age-friendly design
- PMID: 40804492
- PMCID: PMC12350549
- DOI: 10.1007/s40520-025-03157-7
Optimizing mobile app design for older adults: systematic review of age-friendly design
Abstract
Background: With the rapid growth of mobile technology, ensuring accessibility and usability for older adults has become a critical concern. This systematic review evaluates existing age-friendly mobile app design research, identifying key usability barriers and effective strategies for improving accessibility.
Methods: This study reviews English-language research (Published between Jun. 2014 and Mar. 2025) on mobile applications for adults aged 60 + , focusing on user-centered design, usability testing, and age-friendly adaptations. It compares different levels of accessibility features and evaluates their impact on usability, satisfaction, and engagement across various settings. Studies were retrieved from four online databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore).
Results: This systematic review initially reviewed 1,556 records. From these, 132 articles met the inclusion criteria. The findings highlight several essential design elements, including simplified navigation, enlarged text and touch targets, voice interaction, and error-tolerant interfaces. Participatory design methods enhanced usability and satisfaction, demonstrating the importance of co-designing applications with older users. However, challenges like cognitive overload, lack of digital literacy, and accessibility barriers persist.
Conclusion: The review emphasizes the need for future research on Artificial Intelligence-driven personalization, long-term usability studies, and culturally inclusive mobile applications. By integrating age-friendly design principles, developers can enhance digital inclusion, promote independence, and improve the overall well-being of older adults in an increasingly digital world.
Keywords: Age-friendly design; Elderly; HCI; Mobile applications; Usability.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.
Similar articles
-
Researched Apps Used in Dementia Care for People Living With Dementia and Their Informal Caregivers: Systematic Review on App Features, Security, and Usability.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 12;25:e46188. doi: 10.2196/46188. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37824187 Free PMC article.
-
Designing Survey-Based Mobile Interfaces for Rural Patients With Cancer Using Apple's ResearchKit and CareKit: Usability Study.JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 26;8:e57801. doi: 10.2196/57801. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 39326043 Free PMC article.
-
Conversational Systems for Social Care in Older Adults: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 10;14:e72310. doi: 10.2196/72310. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025. PMID: 40638917 Free PMC article.
-
Design Guidelines of Mobile Apps for Older Adults: Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Sep 21;11:e43186. doi: 10.2196/43186. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023. PMID: 37733401 Free PMC article.
-
User Experience of Older Adults With an Age-Friendly Transportation Planning E-Tool: Scoping Review.JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jul 28;12:e63273. doi: 10.2196/63273. JMIR Hum Factors. 2025. PMID: 40720889 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alkhomsan MN, Alturayeif N, Alwadei S et al (2023) Usage guidelines: toward usable Saudi M-government applications for elderly users. J King Saud Univ 35:202–218
-
- Correia GDS, Silva A, Pinto LF et al (2024) Usability of the ROBOVID mobile app for health education about COVID-19. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 32:e4191 - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous