Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan-Dec;96(1):e70090.
doi: 10.1111/asj.70090.

Managing Boar Taint: Issues, Prevention Strategies, and Detection Methods

Affiliations
Review

Managing Boar Taint: Issues, Prevention Strategies, and Detection Methods

Ricardo Pereira-Pinto et al. Anim Sci J. 2025 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Managing boar taint involves addressing welfare concerns related to castration, understanding the compounds causing the taint, and developing reliable detection methods. Surgical castration of piglets is common but raises welfare issues, prompting calls for alternatives. The European Union has seen slow progress in banning castration without pain relief, with varying national approaches. Boar taint, caused by androstenone and skatole, produces unpleasant odors and flavors in pork. Factors like genetics, age, and rearing conditions affect taint levels. Raising entire males or using immunocastration are the two main alternatives to physical castration, but both come with drawbacks such as welfare concerns and increased costs. Other strategies include feed supplementation, management practices, and genetic approaches. Detecting boar taint is crucial to ensure product quality, but no universal measurement standard exists. Efforts should focus on improving detection methods and processing techniques to reduce taint perception, balancing welfare, production efficiency, and consumer satisfaction. This review synthesizes existing scientific knowledge on boar taint, its prevention, and detection methods, while highlighting innovative strategies and critical research gaps to guide future advancements in sustainable pork production.

Keywords: androstenone; entire male pigs; physical castration; pork; skatole.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Aaslyng, M. D., E. H. D. Broge, P. B. Brockhoff, and R. H. Christensen. 2015. “The Effect of Skatole and Androstenone on Consumer Response Towards Streaky Bacon and Pork Belly Roll.” Meat Science 110: 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.07.001.
    1. Aaslyng, M. D., and A. G. Koch. 2018. “The Use of Smoke as a Strategy for Masking Boar Taint in Sausages and Bacon.” Food Research International 108: 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.03.069.
    1. Ahmed, S., X. P. Jiang, G. Q. Liu, et al. 2022. “New Trends in Immunocastration and Its Potential to Improve Animal Welfare: A Mini Review.” Tropical Animal Health and Production 54: 369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250‐022‐03348‐8.
    1. Aldal, I., O. Andresen, A. K. Egeli, et al. 2005. “Levels of Androstenone and Skatole and the Occurrence of Boar Taint in Fat From Young Boars.” Livestock Production Science 95, no. 1–2: 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.12.010.
    1. Alles, M. S., J. G. A. Hautvast, F. M. Nagengast, R. Hartemink, K. M. J. vanLaere, and J. Jansen. 1996. “Fate of Fructo‐Oligosaccharides in the Human Intestine.” British Journal of Nutrition 76, no. 2: 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19960026.

LinkOut - more resources