Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 30;15(15):2238.
doi: 10.3390/ani15152238.

Effects of Chestnut Tannin Extract on Enteric Methane Emissions, Blood Metabolites and Lactation Performance in Mid-Lactation Cows

Affiliations

Effects of Chestnut Tannin Extract on Enteric Methane Emissions, Blood Metabolites and Lactation Performance in Mid-Lactation Cows

Radiša Prodanović et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Dietary tannin supplementation represents a potential strategy to modulate rumen fermentation and enhance lactation performance in dairy cows, though responses remain inconsistent. A 21-day feeding trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of chestnut tannin (CNT) extract on the enteric methane emissions (EME), blood metabolites, and milk production traits in mid-lactation dairy cows. Thirty-six Holstein cows were allocated to three homogeneous treatment groups: control (CNT0, 0 g/d CNT), CNT40 (40 g/d CNT), and CNT80 (80 g/d CNT). Measurements of EME, dry matter intake (DMI), milk yield (MY), and blood and milk parameters were carried out pre- and post-21-day supplementation period. Compared with the no-additive group, the CNT extract reduced methane production, methane yield, and methane intensity in CNT40 and CNT80 (p < 0.001). CNT40 and CNT80 cows exhibited lower blood urea nitrogen (p = 0.019 and p = 0.002) and elevated serum insulin (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001) and growth hormone concentrations (p = 0.046 and p = 0.034), coinciding with reduced aspartate aminotransferase (p = 0.016 and p = 0.045), and lactate dehydrogenase (p = 0.011 and p = 0.008) activities compared to control. However, CNT80 had higher circulating NEFA and BHBA than CNT0 (p = 0.003 and p = 0.004) and CNT40 (p = 0.035 and p = 0.019). The blood glucose, albumin, and total bilirubin concentrations were not affected. MY and fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM), MY/DMI, and FPCM/DMI were higher in both CNT40 (p = 0.004, p = 0.003, p = 0.014, p = 0.010) and CNT80 (p = 0.002, p = 0.003, p = 0.008, p = 0.013) cows compared with controls. Feeding CNT80 resulted in higher protein content (p = 0.015) but lower fat percentage in milk (p = 0.004) compared to CNT0. Milk urea nitrogen and somatic cell counts were significantly lower in both CNT40 (p < 0.001, p = 0.009) and CNT80 (p < 0.001 for both) compared to CNT0, while milk lactose did not differ between treatments. These findings demonstrate that chestnut tannin extract effectively mitigates EME while enhancing lactation performance in mid-lactation dairy cows.

Keywords: hormonal status; metabolic status; methane mitigation; milk yield; supplements; sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scheme of the experimental design. CNT0—no supplemented cows; CNT40—cows supplemented with 40 g of chestnut tannin extract; CNT80—cows supplemented with 80 g of chestnut tannin extract; AC—acclimation period; SM—sampling and measurement period.

References

    1. Herrero M., Henderson B., Havlík P., Thornton P.K., Conant R.T., Smith P., Wirsenius S., Hristov A.N., Gerber P., Gill M., et al. Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potentials in the Livestock Sector. Nat. Clim. Change. 2016;6:452–461. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2925. - DOI
    1. Evangelista C., Milanesi M., Pietrucci D., Chillemi G., Bernabucci U. Enteric Methane Emission in Livestock Sector: Bibliometric Research from 1986 to 2024 with Text Mining and Topic Analysis Approach by Machine Learning Algorithms. Animals. 2024;14:3158. doi: 10.3390/ani14213158. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Appuhamy J.A.D.R.N., France J., Kebreab E. Models for Predicting Enteric Methane Emissions from Dairy Cows in North America, Europe, and Australia and New Zealand. Glob. Change Biol. 2016;22:3039–3056. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13339. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Luke J.R., Tonsor G.T. A Review of Producer Adoption in the U.S. Beef Industry with Application to Enteric Methane Emission Mitigation Strategies. Animals. 2025;15:144. doi: 10.3390/ani15020144. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vargas J., Ungerfeld E., Muñoz C., Dilorenzo N. Feeding Strategies to Mitigate Enteric Methane Emission from Ruminants in Grassland Systems. Animals. 2022;12:1132. doi: 10.3390/ani12091132. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources