Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 26;13(15):1823.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151823.

Airway Management in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Comprehensive Review of Assessment Strategies, Techniques, and Technological Advances

Affiliations
Review

Airway Management in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Comprehensive Review of Assessment Strategies, Techniques, and Technological Advances

Mario Giuseppe Bellizzi et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Airway management in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) presents unique challenges for anesthesiologists and other airway practitioners. This comprehensive review examines current evidence and clinical practices for managing difficult airways in this high-risk population. OSA is characterized by specific anatomical and physiological alterations that increase both the likelihood of encountering difficult intubation and the risk of rapid desaturation during airway manipulation. Methods: Preoperative assessment of OSA patients requires integration of traditional difficult airway evaluation with OSA-specific considerations, including severity indices, oxygen desaturation patterns, and continuous positive airway pressure dependency. Conventional direct laryngoscopy often proves inadequate in these patients, prompting the development and refinement of alternative approaches. Videolaryngoscopy has emerged as a particularly valuable technique in OSA patients, offering improved glottic visualization while maintaining physiologic positioning. Flexible endoscopic techniques, particularly awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation, remain essential for high-risk scenarios, though they require considerable expertise. Results: Recent technological innovations have produced hybrid devices combining multiple modalities to address the specific challenges presented by OSA patients. Adjunctive tools and techniques, including specialized introducers, exchange catheters, and high-flow nasal oxygen, play critical roles in extending safe apnea time and facilitating successful intubation. Professional society guidelines now incorporate OSA-specific recommendations, emphasizing thorough preparation, appropriate device selection, and comprehensive monitoring. Conclusions: Effective management ultimately requires not only appropriate technology but also systematic preparation, strategic device selection, and meticulous execution. As OSA prevalence continues to rise globally, optimizing airway management approaches for this challenging population remains a critical priority for patient safety.

Keywords: airway assessment; anesthesia guidelines; apneic oxygenation; difficult airway management; flexible endoscopic intubation; hybrid airway devices; obstructive sleep apnea; perioperative complications; preoxygenation; videolaryngoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preoperative airway assessment in OSA patients: Key challenges and considerations. This figure illustrates the essential components of preoperative airway evaluation specific to OSA patients, highlighting anatomical factors, physiological alterations, and risk assessment tools that influence airway management decisions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
New perspectives and future challenges for technological advancements. This figure depicts emerging airway management technologies for OSA patients, including hybrid devices, video-assisted techniques, and advanced visualization systems, alongside future challenges and development opportunities in this rapidly evolving field.

Similar articles

References

    1. Young T., Peppard P.E., Gottlieb D.J. Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: A population health perspective. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002;165:1217–1239. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2109080. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maniaci A., Lavalle S., Parisi F.M., Barbanti M., Cocuzza S., Iannella G., Magliulo G., Pace A., Lentini M., Masiello E., et al. Impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Sympathetic Nervous System on Cardiac Health: A Comprehensive Review. J Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024;11:204. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11070204. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heinzer R., Vat S., Marques-Vidal P., Marti-Soler H., Andries D., Tobback N., Mooser V., Preisig M., Malhotra A., Waeber G., et al. Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in the general population: The HypnoLaus study. Lancet. Respir. Med. 2015;3:310–318. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00043-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lavalle S., Masiello E., Iannella G., Magliulo G., Pace A., Lechien J.R., Calvo-Henriquez C., Cocuzza S., Parisi F.M., Favier V., et al. Unraveling the Complexities of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Biomarkers in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review. Life. 2024;14:425. doi: 10.3390/life14040425. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang S., Li S., Zhao Y., Zhao X., Zhou Z., Hao Q., Luo A., Sun R. Preoperative screening of patients at high risk of obstructive sleep apnea and postoperative complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Anesth. 2022;79:110692. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110692. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources