Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 28;26(15):7281.
doi: 10.3390/ijms26157281.

The Human Mycobiome: Composition, Immune Interactions, and Impact on Disease

Affiliations
Review

The Human Mycobiome: Composition, Immune Interactions, and Impact on Disease

Laura Carrillo-Serradell et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

The fungal component of microbiota, known as the mycobiome, inhabits different body niches such as the skin and the gastrointestinal, respiratory, and genitourinary tracts. Much information has been gained on the bacterial component of the human microbiota, but the mycobiome has remained somewhat elusive due to its sparsity, variability, susceptibility to environmental factors (e.g., early life colonization, diet, or pharmacological treatments), and the specific in vitro culture challenges. Functionally, the mycobiome is known to play a role in modulating innate and adaptive immune responses by interacting with microorganisms and immune cells. The latter elicits anti-fungal responses via the recognition of specific fungal cell-wall components (e.g., β-1,3-glucan, mannan, and chitin) by immune system receptors. These receptors then regulate the activation and differentiation of many innate and adaptive immune cells including mucocutaneous cell barriers, macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic cells, natural killer cells, innate-like lymphoid cells, and T and B lymphocytes. Mycobiome disruptions have been correlated with various diseases affecting mostly the brain, lungs, liver and pancreas. This work reviews our current knowledge on the mycobiome, focusing on its composition, research challenges, conditioning factors, interactions with the bacteriome and the immune system, and the known mycobiome alterations associated with disease.

Keywords: autoimmunity; cancer; fungal receptors; immune cells; infection; inflammation; mycobiome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

F.L. is the founder and ad honorem scientific advisor of Sepsia Therapeutics S.L. M.I. is a founding partner of Sepsia Therapeutics S.L. The rest of the authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Immune cell receptors and cell-mediated responses contributing to fungal recognition and overgrowth control in the intestinal mucosa. (A) Structurally and functionally diverse families of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) expressed by different innate and adoptive immune cell types well-represented in the intestinal mucosa and involved in fungal recognition (i.e., CLRs, TLRs, NKRs, and SRs). (B) Cell-mediated responses against fungi first involve different cell types from the intestinal mucosal barrier, including enterocytes, Goblet cells, Paneth cells, and M cells involved in alarmin release, mucin production, AMP production, and transcytosis processes (sample and transport antigens/pathogens from the luminal surface to the sub-epithelium), respectively. In the lamina propria, DCs and macrophages can engage in fungal antigen presentation to T cells and participate in the antifungal response via cytokine secretion and phagocytosis of harmful fungal particles. In this context, TH17 and ILC3 responses can be triggered, ultimately leading to IL-22 release that can contribute to the integrity of the intestinal barrier. On the other hand, alarmins (e.g., IL-1β, IL-33) and DAMPs released in response to epithelial cell aggression or damage can trigger TH2 and ILC2 responses. Additionally, exposure to whole fungal cells and or particles can engage antifungal responses involving neutrophil activation (NETs formation) as well as T cell-dependent and independent B cell activation (production of ASCAs and NAbs by conventional or innate-type B1a cells, respectively).

Similar articles

  • Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.
    Preuss CV, Kalava A, King KC. Preuss CV, et al. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
  • T-bet expressing Tr1 cells driven by dietary signals dominate the small intestinal immune landscape.
    Ansaldo E, Yong D, Carrillo N, McFadden T, Abid M, Corral D, Rivera C, Farley T, Bouladoux N, Gribonika I, Belkaid Y. Ansaldo E, et al. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Jul 4:2025.06.30.662190. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.30.662190. bioRxiv. 2025. PMID: 40747421 Free PMC article. Preprint.
  • Type 1 Diabetes: A Guide to Autoimmune Mechanisms for Clinicians.
    Mauvais FX, van Endert PM. Mauvais FX, et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Aug;27 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):40-56. doi: 10.1111/dom.16460. Epub 2025 May 15. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025. PMID: 40375390 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Interactions Between the Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses.
    George AJT, Al Aiyan A, Al-Ramadi BK, Kishore U. George AJT, et al. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2025;1476:297-308. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-85340-1_12. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2025. PMID: 40622548 Review.
  • Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).
    Papatsoris A, Geavlete B, Radavoi GD, Alameedee M, Almusafer M, Ather MH, Budia A, Cumpanas AA, Kiremi MC, Dellis A, Elhowairis M, Galán-Llopis JA, Geavlete P, Guimerà Garcia J, Isern B, Jinga V, Lopez JM, Mainez JA, Mitsogiannis I, Mora Christian J, Moussa M, Multescu R, Oguz Acar Y, Petkova K, Piñero A, Popov E, Ramos Cebrian M, Rascu S, Siener R, Sountoulides P, Stamatelou K, Syed J, Trinchieri A. Papatsoris A, et al. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085. Epub 2025 Jun 30. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025. PMID: 40583613 Review.

References

    1. Berg G., Rybakova D., Fischer D., Cernava T., Vergès M.-C.C., Charles T., Chen X., Cocolin L., Eversole K., Corral G.H., et al. Microbiome Definition Re-Visited: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Microbiome. 2020;8:103. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dekaboruah E., Suryavanshi M.V., Chettri D., Verma A.K. Human Microbiome: An Academic Update on Human Body Site Specific Surveillance and Its Possible Role. Arch. Microbiol. 2020;202:2147–2167. doi: 10.1007/s00203-020-01931-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hallen-Adams H.E., Kachman S.D., Kim J., Legge R.M., Martínez I. Fungi Inhabiting the Healthy Human Gastrointestinal Tract: A Diverse and Dynamic Community. Fungal Ecol. 2015;15:9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.01.006. - DOI
    1. Nash A.K., Auchtung T.A., Wong M.C., Smith D.P., Gesell J.R., Ross M.C., Stewart C.J., Metcalf G.A., Muzny D.M., Gibbs R.A., et al. The Gut Mycobiome of the Human Microbiome Project Healthy Cohort. Microbiome. 2017;5:153. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0373-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dieterich W., Schink M., Zopf Y. Microbiota in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Med. Sci. 2018;6:116. doi: 10.3390/medsci6040116. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources