Quality of Life Enhancement After Penetrating Keratoplasty in Keratoconus: A Vision-Related Functional Perspective
- PMID: 40806946
- PMCID: PMC12347754
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm14155325
Quality of Life Enhancement After Penetrating Keratoplasty in Keratoconus: A Vision-Related Functional Perspective
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Keratoconus (KC) is a bilateral asymmetric corneal ectasia characterized by progressive corneal thinning, irregular astigmatism, and impaired visual acuity. The National Eye Institute (NEI) developed the Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) to assess the impact of visual impairment on quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) on quality of life and visual acuity in KC patients one year postoperatively. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2022 at the Ophthalmology Department of Saint Barbara Hospital, Trauma Center, Sosnowiec, Poland. A total of 71 patients (86 eyes) diagnosed with KC underwent PKP. The VFQ-25 questionnaire and visual acuity measurements were assessed preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Results: The study cohort included 71 patients (20 females, 28.17%; 51 males, 71.83%). Preoperative visual acuity ranged from less than 0.05 on the Snellen chart to 0.5. Postoperatively, visual acuity improved to a range of 0.1-1.0. A visual acuity of 1.0 was achieved in 21 eyes (24.42%; 5 females, 24%; 16 males, 76%), with a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.01). The mean VFQ-25 composite score increased from 57.96 (±17.58) preoperatively to 81.42 (±14.66) postoperatively (p < 0.001). Domains with the lowest preoperative scores were "role difficulties," "general vision," and "mental health," while "color vision" scored highest. Conclusions: PKP significantly enhances both objective visual acuity and subjective quality of life in KC patients, as reflected in VFQ-25 questionnaire outcomes.
Keywords: keratoconus; penetrating keratoplasty; quality of life; retrospective studies; visual acuity.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for treating keratoconus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 22;2014(7):CD009700. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009700.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25055058 Free PMC article.
-
Endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;2014(2):CD008420. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008420.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24526345 Free PMC article.
-
Endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6;(7):CD008420. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008420.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;(2):CD008420. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008420.pub3. PMID: 21735430 Updated.
-
Community screening for visual impairment in older people.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 20;2(2):CD001054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001054.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29460275 Free PMC article.
-
Immunosuppressants for the prophylaxis of corneal graft rejection after penetrating keratoplasty.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 27;2015(8):CD007603. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007603.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26313245 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Albé E. Keratoconus and Corneal Noninflammatory Ectasias. In: Albert D.M., Miller J.W., Azar D.T., Young L.H., editors. Albert and Jakobiec’s Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2022. pp. 127–148.
-
- Al Bdour M., Alsaadi A., Almaazmi A., Alryalat S.A. Clinical Review of Cornea: Part I. In: Alryalat S.A., editor. Ophthalmology Board and FRCS Part 2 Exams. Springer Nature; Singapore: 2025. pp. 257–277.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources