Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 1;14(15):5426.
doi: 10.3390/jcm14155426.

The Effect of Heterogeneous Definitions of Massive Transfusion on Using Blood Component Thresholds to Predict Futility in Severely Bleeding Trauma Patients

Affiliations
Review

The Effect of Heterogeneous Definitions of Massive Transfusion on Using Blood Component Thresholds to Predict Futility in Severely Bleeding Trauma Patients

Samuel J Thomas et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

In the trauma resuscitation literature, there are inconsistent definitions of what constitutes massive transfusion and a unit of blood, complicating the use of transfusion cut-points to declare futility. This is problematic as it can lead to the inefficient use of blood products, further exacerbating current blood product shortages. Previous studies have used various transfusion cut-points per hour to define futility in retrospective analyses but have not accurately defined futility at the bedside due to patient survival even at large rates and volumes of blood transfused. In an attempt to use transfusion cut-points as a marker to help define futility, guidelines have been proposed to limit blood product waste in transfusions for severely bleeding trauma patients, such as Suspension of Transfusion and Other Procedures (STOP) for patients older than 15 and the Futility of Resuscitation Measure (FoRM), used to determine futility in patients older than 60. In an effort to construct effective bedside futile resuscitation criteria with 100% positive predictive value and specificity, this review proposes the use of specific blood component transfusion cut-points combined with parameters from both STOP and FoRM to allow for a comprehensive and accurate method of declaring futility in severely bleeding trauma patients.

Keywords: algorithm; blood component transfusion; futile resuscitation; hemorrhage; massive transfusion; medical futility; red blood cells; trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

E.E.M. and H.B.M. have received research grants from Haemonetics Corporation outside of the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A summary of the STOP and FoRM criteria [13,15]. Abbreviations: ED (emergency department), FoRM (Futility of Resuscitation Measure), GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale), LY30 (lysis at 30 min), PRBC (packed red blood cell), REBOA (resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta), ROSC (return of spontaneous circulation), SBP (systolic blood pressure), STOP (Suspension of Transfusion and Other Procedures), TBI (traumatic brain injury). Created in BioRender. Al-fadhl, M. (2025) https://BioRender.com/bo67sz0 (accessed on 18 June 2025).
Figure 2
Figure 2
A flowchart of suggested steps, based on STOP and FoRM protocols, when faced with the decision to declare futility in bleeding trauma patients. Abbreviations: FoRM (Futility of Resuscitation Measure), GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale), LY30 (lysis at 30 min), PRBC (packed red blood cell), REBOA (resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta), ROSC (return of spontaneous circulation), SBP (systolic blood pressure), STOP (Suspension of Transfusion and Other Procedures), TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) Created in BioRender. Al-fadhl, M. (2025) https://BioRender.com/n6lg8hm (accessed on 18 June 2025).

Similar articles

References

    1. Doughty H., Green L., Callum J., Murphy M.F., National Blood Transfusion Committee Triage tool for the rationing of blood for massively bleeding patients during a severe national blood shortage: Guidance from the National Blood Transfusion Committee. Br. J. Haematol. 2020;191:340–346. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16736. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Emanuel E.J., Persad G., Upshur R., Thome B., Parker M., Glickman A., Zhang C., Boyle C., Smith M., Phillips J.P. Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:2049–2055. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim J.S., Casem C.F., Baral E., Inaba K., Kuza C.M. Narrative Review: Is There a Transfusion Cutoff Value After Which Nonsurvivability Is Inevitable in Trauma Patients Receiving Ultramassive Transfusion? Anesth. Analg. 2023;137:354–364. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006504. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mladinov D., Frank S.M. Massive transfusion and severe blood shortages: Establishing and implementing predictors of futility. Br. J. Anaesth. 2022;128:e71–e74. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nakashima B., Schellenberg M., Gold A.I., Matsushima K., Martin M.J., Inaba K. Resuscitative Thoracotomy for Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: Potential Impact of Resource Constraint on Outcomes and Blood Product Utilization. J. Surg. Res. 2024;295:683–689. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.063. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources