Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 1;14(15):5432.
doi: 10.3390/jcm14155432.

Targeting Psychotic and Cognitive Dimensions in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P): A Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Targeting Psychotic and Cognitive Dimensions in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P): A Narrative Review

Michele Ribolsi et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a debilitating disorder with substantial societal and economic impacts. The clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR-P) state generally precedes the onset of SCZ, offering a window for early intervention. However, treatment guidelines for CHR-P individuals remain contentious, particularly regarding antipsychotic (AP) medications. Although several studies have examined the effects of APs on reducing the risk of conversion to psychosis, the novelty of this narrative review lies in its focus on differentiating APs' effects on positive and negative symptoms, as well as cognitive functioning, in CHR-P individuals. Evidence suggests that APs may be cautiously recommended for attenuated positive symptoms to stabilize individuals for psychological interventions, but their use in treating negative symptoms is generally discouraged due to limited efficacy and potential side effects. Similarly, the effects of APs on cognitive abilities remain underexplored, with results indicating a lack of significant neurocognitive outcomes. In conclusion, APs' use in CHR-P patients requires careful consideration due to limited evidence and potential adverse effects. Future research should focus on individual symptom domains and treatment modalities to optimize outcomes in this critical population. Until then, a cautious approach emphasizing non-pharmacological interventions is advisable.

Keywords: CHR-P; UHR; antipsychotics; clinical high risk of psychosis; cognitive abilities; negative symptoms; positive symptoms; ultra-high risk of psychosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

G.D.L. has received personal fees from Angelini, FB Health, Lundbeck, Neuraxpharm, and Otsuka for speaking. The other authors do not have any conflict of interest to disclose.

Similar articles

References

    1. Chong H.Y., Teoh S.L., Wu D.B., Kotirum S., Chiou C.F., Chaiyakunapruk N. Global economic burden of schizophrenia: A systematic review. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2016;12:357–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.293. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laursen T.M. Causes of premature mortality in schizophrenia: A review of literature published in 2018. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry. 2019;32:388–393. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000530. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Millier A., Schmidt U., Angermeyer M.C., Chauhan D., Murthy V., Toumi M., Cadi-Soussi N. Humanistic burden in schizophrenia: A literature review. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2014;54:85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.03.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Addington J., Heinssen R. Prediction and Prevention of Psychosis in Youth at Clinical High Risk. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2012;8:269–289. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143146. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Møller P., Husby R. The Initial Prodrome in Schizophrenia: Searching for Naturalistic Core Dimensions of Experience and Behavior. Schizophr. Bull. 2000;26:217–232. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033442. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources