Failure to Improve Lumbar Lordosis After Single-Level TLIF for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Does Not Impair Clinical Outcomes at 8.6 Years Postoperatively: A Prospective Cohort of 32 Patients
- PMID: 40807077
- PMCID: PMC12347375
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm14155457
Failure to Improve Lumbar Lordosis After Single-Level TLIF for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Does Not Impair Clinical Outcomes at 8.6 Years Postoperatively: A Prospective Cohort of 32 Patients
Abstract
Background: We aimed to analyze radiographic sagittal balance parameters in patients who underwent a TLIF procedure for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis with a mean follow-up of 8.6 years and to determine whether lumbar lordosis affects long-term clinical outcomes. Methods: This prospective study included 32 patients who underwent single-level TLIF surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Radiographic analysis of sagittal balance parameters and clinical examination including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were performed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. A minimal clinically important difference threshold of 30% was accepted as clinically relevant. Results: Mean postoperative lumbar lordosis (LL) and segmental lordosis (SL) failed to improve postoperatively; nevertheless significant improvements in short- and long-term postoperative ODI scores were demonstrated (p < 0.001). Thoracic kyphosis (TK) and global sagittal balance parameters shifted anteriorly after 8.6 years (p < 0.001), but this increase did not affect clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Adequate decompression and solid bone fusion are foremost required to achieve improved long-term clinical outcomes in single-level TLIF procedures. In our studied cohort, failure to improve lordosis did not impair clinical outcomes postoperatively. With aging, thoracic kyphosis and anterior malalignment increase, and after 8.6 years, clinical improvements are starting to become insignificant.
Keywords: TLIF; clinical outcomes; degenerative spondylolisthesis; lumbar lordosis; sagittal balance.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive versus mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in managing low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Sep 12;166(1):365. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06231-7. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024. PMID: 39264454 Free PMC article.
-
Does restoration of focal lumbar lordosis for single level degenerative spondylolisthesis result in better patient-reported clinical outcomes? A systematic literature review.J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Oct;44:95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.039. Epub 2017 Jul 31. J Clin Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28774491
-
Segmental and overall lumbar lordosis after single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Neurosurg Spine. 2025 May 2;43(1):70-82. doi: 10.3171/2025.1.SPINE231363. Print 2025 Jul 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2025. PMID: 40315610
-
Effect of Clinical and Radiographic Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Classification on Patient-reported Outcomes and Spinopelvic Parameters for Patients With Single-level L4-L5 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis After Lumbar Fusion.Clin Spine Surg. 2023 Oct 1;36(8):E345-E352. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001461. Epub 2023 Apr 17. Clin Spine Surg. 2023. PMID: 37074794
-
Examination of clinical and radiographic outcomes after lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective analysis of TLIF, MidLIF, and MIS-TLIF procedures.J Neurosurg Spine. 2025 May 2;43(1):52-62. doi: 10.3171/2025.1.SPINE241286. Print 2025 Jul 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2025. PMID: 40315609
References
-
- Aoki Y., Inoue M., Takahashi H., Nakajima A., Sonobe M., Terajima F., Nakajima T., Sato Y., Kubota G., Sato M., et al. Changes in lumbar lordosis and predicted minimum 5-year surgical outcomes after short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:14353. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18679-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources