Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 6;14(15):5544.
doi: 10.3390/jcm14155544.

Updates in Contemporary Management of Singleton Pregnancies Complicated by a Short Cervix

Affiliations
Review

Updates in Contemporary Management of Singleton Pregnancies Complicated by a Short Cervix

Moti Gulersen et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Singleton pregnancies complicated by a short cervical length (≤25 mm) are at significantly increased risk for spontaneous preterm birth. Several treatment strategies aimed at reducing this risk and improving perinatal outcomes have been evaluated, including vaginal progesterone, cervical cerclage, and cervical pessary. This review summarizes the latest evidence regarding the efficacy of these interventions. Vaginal progesterone and/or cervical cerclage have been identified as proven evidence-based practices for preterm birth prevention and improve neonatal outcomes. Vaginal progesterone reduces the risk of preterm birth < 35 weeks by 27% (relative risk 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.90). Cervical cerclage has been shown to reduce the risk of preterm birth < 35 weeks by 30% (relative risk 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.89) in patients with a short cervical length and prior preterm birth. In contrast, recent data suggest that cervical pessary should no longer be considered a management option for these patients. A continued focus on individualized, evidence-based approaches remains essential to optimizing outcomes in this high-risk population.

Keywords: cerclage; cervical length; cervical pessary; neonatal morbidity; prematurity; preterm birth; vaginal progesterone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Suggested algorithm for management of patients with a short cervical length and no prior spontaneous preterm birth.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Suggested algorithm for management of patients with a short cervical length and prior spontaneous preterm birth.

Similar articles

References

    1. Liang X., Lyu Y., Li J., Li Y., Chi C. Global, regional, and national burden of preterm birth, 1990-2021: A systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study 2021. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;76:102840. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102840. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iams J.D., Goldenberg R.L., Meis P.J., Mercer B.M., Moawad A., Das A., Thom E., McNellis D., Copper R.L., Johnson F., et al. The length of the cervix and risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996;334:567–572. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602293340904. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoffman M.K. Prediction and prevention of spontaneous preterm birth. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 234. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021;138:e65–e90. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004612. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hessami K., D’Alberti E., Mascio D.D., Berghella V. Universal cervical length screening and risk of spontaneous preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM. 2024;6:101343. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101343. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Biggio J. SMFM Consult Series #70: Management of short cervix in individuals without a history of spontaneous preterm birth. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2024;231:B2–B13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.006. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources