Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 4;25(15):4788.
doi: 10.3390/s25154788.

Evaluating Insulin Delivery Systems Using Dynamic Glucose Region Plots and Risk Space Analysis

Klavs W Hansen  1   2 , Mia Christensen  2 , Sanne Fisker  3 , Ermina Bach  3   4 , Bo M Bibby  5
Affiliations

Evaluating Insulin Delivery Systems Using Dynamic Glucose Region Plots and Risk Space Analysis

Klavs W Hansen et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Simultaneous values of glucose rate of change (RoC) and glucose can be presented in a dynamic glucose region plot, and risk spaces can be specified for (RoC, glucose) values expected to remain in the target range (glucose 3.9-10.0 mmol/L) or leave or return to the target range within the next 30 min. We downloaded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data for 60 days from persons with type 1 diabetes using two different systems for automated insulin delivery (AID), A (n = 65) or B (n = 85). The relative distribution of (RoC, glucose) values in risk spaces was compared. The fraction of all (RoC, glucose) values anticipated to remain in the target range in the next 30 min was higher with system A (62.5%) than with system B (56.8%) (difference 5.7, 95% CI (2.2-9.2%), p = 0.002). The fraction of (RoC, glucose) values in the target range with a risk of progressing to the above range (glucose > 10.0 mmol/L) was slightly lower in system A than in B (difference -1.1 (95% CI: -1.8--0.5%, p < 0.001). Dynamic glucose region plots and the concept of risk spaces are novel strategies to obtain insight into glucose homeostasis and to demonstrate clinically relevant differences comparing two AID systems.

Keywords: automated insulin delivery; continuous glucose monitoring; dynamic glucose region plots; glucose rate of change; risk space analysis; type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KWH has received research grants for an investigator-initiated study from Abbott Diabetes Care and Novo Nordisk.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Template to describe the relation of glucose dynamic risk spaces A, B, C, D, E, and O to the spaces for glucose above the target range, in the target range, and below the target range.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A two-dimensional heatmap of the distribution of (RoC, glucose) pairs in glucose dynamic risk spaces for (left) users of the MM780G (351,591 pairs) and (right) users of CoIQ system (461,943 pairs).
Figure 3
Figure 3
A three-dimensional heatmap of the distribution of (RoC, glucose) pairs in the MM780G system users.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A three-dimensional heatmap of the distribution of (RoC, glucose) pairs in users of the CoIQ system.
Figure 5
Figure 5
A two-dimensional heatmap of the distribution of (RoC, glucose) pairs in glucose dynamic risk spaces for users of (left) the AID pumps (853,534 values) and (right) users of isCGM (1,181,627 values).
Figure 6
Figure 6
A three-dimensional heatmap of the distribution of (Roc, glucose) values in users of isCGM.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Considine E.G., Sherr J.L. Real-World Evidence of Automated Insulin Delivery System Use. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2024;26((Suppl. S3)):53–65. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0442. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Limbert C., Kowalski A.J., Danne T.P.A. Automated Insulin Delivery: A Milestone on the Road to Insulin Independence in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2024;47:918–920. doi: 10.2337/dci24-0007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Minsky N., Shalit R., Benedetti A., Laron-Hirsh M., Cohen O., Kurtz N., Ro A., Grosman B., Tirosh A. Simplified Meal Management in Adults Using an Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2025;27:27–33. doi: 10.1089/dia.2024.0224. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tornese G., Carletti C., Giangreco M., Nistico D., Faleschini E., Barbi E. Carbohydrate Tolerance Threshold for Unannounced Snacks in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Using an Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System. Diabetes Care. 2022;45:1486–1488. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2643. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sherr J.L., Heinemann L., Fleming G.A., Bergenstal R.M., Bruttomesso D., Hanaire H., Holl R.W., Petrie J.R., Peters A.L., Evans M. Automated Insulin Delivery: Benefits, Challenges, and Recommendations. A Consensus Report of the Joint Diabetes Technology Working Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2022;45:3058–3074. doi: 10.2337/dci22-0018. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources