Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 31;17(7):5282-5297.
doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1793. Epub 2025 Jul 29.

State-of-the-art artificial intelligence methods for pre-operative planning of cardiothoracic surgery and interventions: a narrative review

Affiliations
Review

State-of-the-art artificial intelligence methods for pre-operative planning of cardiothoracic surgery and interventions: a narrative review

Quinten J Mank et al. J Thorac Dis. .

Abstract

Background and objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly explored as a tool to enhance clinical decision-making and optimize and speed up preoperative planning in cardiothoracic surgery. By improving precision and efficiency, AI has the potential to streamline workflows and improve outcomes. This study aimed to examine the current applications of AI in preoperative planning for cardiothoracic procedures.

Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature in PubMed. Two search strings were employed to identify research articles related to AI applications in preoperative cardiothoracic surgery planning published up to August 2024. Studies were screened, and articles were included based on predefined criteria.

Key content and findings: A total of 525 articles were extracted from the PubMed database. After applying exclusion criteria and analyzing the articles, 32 articles were included. These articles were categorized into and described according to their application: aortic (valve) surgery/intervention, mitral valve surgery/intervention, other cardiac surgeries, and lung, thoracic wall, and mediastinal surgeries. Key AI applications included segmentation of anatomical structures, tumor detection, prosthesis sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and automated measurement of surgical parameters. The reviewed studies demonstrated that AI could increase segmentation accuracy, reduce preoperative planning time, and automate critical steps in surgical preparation.

Conclusions: AI has been introduced in preoperative planning for cardiothoracic procedures to support clinicians by increasing segmentation accuracy, reducing preoperative planning time, and automating several preoperative planning steps such as tumor detection, TAVI prosthesis sizing and other planning measurements. However, the widespread adoption faces several challenges, including the need for robust validation, regulatory approval, and integration into clinical workflows. Additionally, the implementation of AI involves substantial costs, including investments in software development, computational infrastructure, and training of clinical staff. Future research should focus not only on advancing AI technology but also on evaluating the cost-effectiveness to ensure it delivers measurable benefits while remaining accessible and sustainable for healthcare systems. Addressing these issues is essential to realize the full potential of AI in cardiothoracic surgery.

Keywords: Cardiothoracic surgery (CTS); artificial intelligence (AI); deep learning (DL); machine learning (ML); surgical planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-24-1793/coif). Q.J.M. is a part-time employee of Surgical Reality. A.H.S. is a co-inventor of Surgical Reality. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Article selection and PRISMA flow diagram. AI, artificial intelligence; CTS, Cardiothoracic surgery; preop, preoperative planning.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of the included literature. (a descriptive caption). (A) Pie chart of the included papers based on the predetermined categories. (B) Bar chart of the number of publications included for this review based on year of publication.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hennessy SA, Lau CL. Cardiothoracic surgery. Am J Surg 2011;202:357-9. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bowdish ME, D'Agostino RS, Thourani VH, et al. STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database: 2021 Update on Outcomes, Quality, and Research. Ann Thorac Surg 2021;111:1770-80. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.03.043 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doenst T, Caldonazo T, Schneider U, et al. Cardiac Surgery 2020 Reviewed. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: . 10.1055/s-0041-1729762 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bapat V, Allen D, Young C, et al. Survival and quality of life after cardiac surgery complicated by prolonged intensive care. J Card Surg 2005;20:212-7. 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2005.200413.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ghanta RK, Shekar PS, McGurk S, et al. Long-term survival and quality of life justify cardiac surgery in the very elderly patient. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:851-7. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.04.083 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources