Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 31;17(7):5238-5249.
doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-1163. Epub 2025 Jul 29.

Diagnostic performance of metagenomics sequencing for pulmonary fungal infections: a clinical evaluation using the Nanopore platform

Affiliations

Diagnostic performance of metagenomics sequencing for pulmonary fungal infections: a clinical evaluation using the Nanopore platform

Zubi Liu et al. J Thorac Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary fungal infections are becoming increasingly prevalent, particularly among immunocompromised patients. Traditional culture-based and serological diagnostic methods exhibit low sensitivity and prolonged turnaround times (TATs), highlighting the need for more efficient diagnostic approaches. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of metagenomic third-generation sequencing (mTGS) using the Oxford Nanopore platform (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) for the detection of fungal pathogens in lower respiratory tract infections, and to compare its effectiveness with conventional diagnostic methods.

Methods: This study evaluated the clinical utility of mTGS with the Nanopore platform for diagnosing lower respiratory tract fungal infections (LRTFIs). Between January and August 2022, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples were collected from 253 patients with suspected fungal infections across four medical centers in Hangzhou, China. Fungal detection was performed through both mTGS and conventional culture, and diagnostic performance was assessed via bioinformatics analysis and clinical adjudication.

Results: Fungal infections were detected in 65 samples (29.3%), with 11 fungal species identified by mTGS, including Pneumocystis jirovecii, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Aspergillus fumigatus. Conventional culture identified only six species, missing key pathogens such as Pneumocystis jirovecii and Talaromyces marneffei. mTGS demonstrated a sensitivity of 78.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 66.0-87.5%], a specificity of 90.5% (95% CI: 84.8-94.7%), a positive predictive value (PPV) of 76.9% (95% CI: 64.8-86.5%), and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.1% (95% CI: 85.4-95.0%). It showed high sensitivity for Pneumocystis jirovecii (76.5%) and Cryptococcus neoformans (82.4%) but lower sensitivity for Aspergillus spp. (66.7%). mTGS also co-detected viral and bacterial pathogens, offering comprehensive pathogen profiling, and significantly shortened the TATs to 7 hours as compared to 2-7 days for culture.

Conclusions: mTGS on the nanopore platform offers a rapid, sensitive, and comprehensive approach for diagnosing LRTFIs, particularly in immunocompromised patients. It serves as a valuable complementary tool for detecting mixed infections or culture-negative pneumonia. However, careful interpretation is needed regarding the clinical relevance of colonizing fungi such as Candida albicans.

Keywords: Metagenomic third-generation sequencing (mTGS); bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF); lower respiratory tract fungal infections (LRTFIs); nanopore sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-2025-1163/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study. mTGS, metagenomic third-generation sequencing.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The species, detection frequency, and rate of pathogenic fungi detection of mTGS. The left y-axis (blue bars) represents the absolute number of detected cases for each fungal species. The right y-axis (orange line) indicates the corresponding detection percentage (%) of each fungal species among the total number of cases. mTGS, metagenomic third-generation sequencing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The species and detection frequency for other pathogens detected alongside pathogenie fungi. The x-axis display the detection frequency of the other pathogens. mTGS, metagenomic third generation sequencing.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of fungal species detected by mTGS and fungal culture methods. mTGS, metagenomic third-generation sequencing.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The number of patients with various typical underlying diseases, along with the detection frequency and detection rate of fungi among them. The left y-axis displays patient counts (orange bars: total patients with underlying diseases; yellow bars: fungus-positive cases). The right y-axis shows the fungal detection rate (blue line, %). COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; HMs, hematologic malignancies; HTN, hypertension; ILD, interstitial lung disease; ST, malignant solid tumor; TB, tuberculosis.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lass-Flörl C, Steixner S. The changing epidemiology of fungal infections. Mol Aspects Med 2023;94:101215. 10.1016/j.mam.2023.101215 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Casadevall A. Immunity to Invasive Fungal Diseases. Annu Rev Immunol 2022;40:121-41. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-101220-034306 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kelly BT, Pennington KM, Limper AH. Advances in the diagnosis of fungal pneumonias. Expert Rev Respir Med 2020;14:703-14. 10.1080/17476348.2020.1753506 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ekeng BE, Davies AA, Osaigbovo II, et al. Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary Manifestations of Fungal Infections Misdiagnosed as Tuberculosis: The Need for Prompt Diagnosis and Management. J Fungi (Basel) 2022;8:460. 10.3390/jof8050460 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao Z, Song J, Yang C, et al. Prevalence of Fungal and Bacterial Co-Infection in Pulmonary Fungal Infections: A Metagenomic Next Generation Sequencing-Based Study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021;11:749905. 10.3389/fcimb.2021.749905 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources