Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 31;17(7):4550-4564.
doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-2112. Epub 2025 Jul 17.

Construction and validation of a nomogram for predicting overall survival in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Affiliations

Construction and validation of a nomogram for predicting overall survival in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Linwu Kuang et al. J Thorac Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the widespread adoption of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) as the primary therapeutic strategy for EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the general survival probabilities for patients in stage IV are still limited. The objective of this research was to create a nomogram that forecasts overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing EGFR-TKI treatment.

Methods: A group of 461 patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC was recruited and randomly divided into training and validation sets in a ratio of 7:3. The predictive nomogram was constructed after identifying independent prognostic factors within the training group by applying the Cox regression analysis. The nomogram was evaluated by R software, with assessments including decision curve analyses, receiver operating characteristic curves, and calibration curves.

Results: Multivariate Cox regression identified brain metastasis, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA 21-1), EGFR-TKIs, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy as independent prognostic factors. The nomogram was constructed based on these prognostic factors. The C-index was 0.713 in both the training and validation cohorts, with calibration curves demonstrating strong concordance between predicted and actual outcomes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated robust predictive accuracy, with values of 0.771, 0.772, and 0.768 at 1, 3, and 5 years in the training cohort, and 0.802, 0.761, and 0.722 in the validation cohort. Decision curve analysis (DCA) confirmed the strong clinical applicability of the nomogram. Based on the nomogram scores, patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups, with OS markedly increased in the latter group over the former (P<0.001).

Conclusions: The nomogram was created using clinical features to forecast OS in stage IV NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations undergoing EGFR-TKI therapy.

Keywords: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs); nomogram; non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); overall survival (OS); stage IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-2024-2112/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prognostic nomogram model for EGFR-TKIs treatment in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. CYFRA 21-1, cytokeratin-19 fragment; EGFR-TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor; NSE, neuron-specific enolase.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic curves for the nomogram model. Receiver operating characteristic curves for 1-, 3-, and 5-year predictions in the training cohort (A-C) and validation cohort (D-F). AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Calibration curves. Calibration curves for 1-, 3-, and 5-year total survival rates in (A-C) the training group, (D-F) the validation group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
DCA for the training cohort. DCA, decision curve analysis.
Figure 5
Figure 5
DCA for the validation cohort. DCA, decision curve analysis.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of survival probability between high- and low-risk groups in the training cohort.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Comparison of survival probability between high- and low-risk groups in the validation cohort.

Similar articles

References

    1. Li H, Li Y, Zheng X, et al. RBM15 facilitates osimertinib resistance of lung adenocarcinoma through m6A-dependent epigenetic silencing of SPOCK1. Oncogene 2025;44:307-21. 10.1038/s41388-024-03220-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gu Z, Huang P, Zhao J, et al. Bilateral diffuse metastases in advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations was associated with a favorable prognosis to EGFR-TKIs. Int J Cancer 2024;154:1979-86. 10.1002/ijc.34878 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu Y, Xiong ZC, Sun X, et al. Impact of apatinib in combination with osimertinib on EGFR T790M-positive lung adenocarcinoma. Transl Cancer Res 2019;8:2151-63. 10.21037/tcr.2019.09.35 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. He J, Huang Z, Han L, et al. Mechanisms and management of 3rd generation EGFR TKI resistance in advanced non small cell lung cancer (Review). Int J Oncol 2021;59:90. 10.3892/ijo.2021.5270 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tan X, Wang S, Xia H, et al. Prognosis prediction of icotinib as targeted therapy for advanced EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients. Invest New Drugs 2023;41:463-72. 10.1007/s10637-023-01329-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources