Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 31;17(7):5223-5237.
doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-1223. Epub 2025 Jul 25.

Combining recombinant human endostatin with third-generation EGFR-TKIs in advanced EGFR-sensitive mutant non-small cell lung cancer

Affiliations

Combining recombinant human endostatin with third-generation EGFR-TKIs in advanced EGFR-sensitive mutant non-small cell lung cancer

Jinhong Chen et al. J Thorac Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are standard first-line options in advanced or metastatic EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of third generation EGFR-TKIs combined with recombinant human endostatin (Endostar) versus EGFR-TKIs alone in previously untreated advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant NSCLC patients.

Methods: A total of 118 untreated advanced EGFR-sensitive-mutant NSCLC patients from a single center were retrospectively included in the study. Of the patients, 71 received third-generation EGFR-TKIs (the T group) and 47 received combination of Endostar and third-generation EGFR-TKIs therapy (the E + T group). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated.

Results: Compared to the T group, the E + T group had a significantly higher ORR (91.5% vs. 77.5%; P=0.047), and improved PFS (20.2 vs. 17.6 months; P=0.002) and OS (41.5 vs. 33.8 months; P=0.04). However, there was no significant difference in the DCR between the two groups (97.9% vs. 97.2%; P>0.99). Multivariate analysis identified the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) score, brain metastasis, EGFR co-mutation, and treatment regimen as independent prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis showed that the E + T group had greater clinical benefits for patients with ≥2 distant metastatic organs (P=0.01) and EGFR/TP53 co-mutations (P=0.01). The incidence of AEs of any level was higher in the E + T group than the T group (53.2% vs. 45.1%, P=0.39).

Conclusions: In this real-world study, the combination of recombinant human endostatin and third-generation EGFR-TKIs significantly improved the ORR, PFS, and OS in previously untreated advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients and thus represents a promising treatment option that requires further prospective evaluation.

Keywords: Endostar; Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFR mutation); epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-2025-1223/coif). A.C.T. receives grants (to institution) from Takeda and AstraZeneca; honoraria from Roche, AstraZeneca, Guardant, Merck, Amgen, Takeda; participated in Advisory Board from Amgen, Bayer, Pfizer. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the patient inclusion process. EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; EGFR-TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of the TP53 mutation (A) and EGFR compound mutations (B) in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS (A) and OS (B) in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC in different treatment groups. T group, EFGR-TKIs group; E + T group, Endostar + EGFR-TKIs group. CI, confidence interval; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; EGFR-TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor; HR, hazard ratio; mOS, median overall survival; mPFS, median progression-free survival; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Subgroup analysis of the PFS of patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC in the T and E + T groups. T group, EGFR-TKIs group; E + T group, Endostar + EGFR-TKIs group. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; ECOG-PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; EGFR-TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PFS, progression-free survival.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS in patients with or without at least a single metastasis or the TP53 co-mutation. (A,B) Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS in patients with <2 organs with metastasis and ≥2 organs with metastasis in the E + T and T groups. (C,D) Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS comparing patients without the TP53 co-mutation and with the TP53 co-mutation in the E + T and T groups. T group, EGFR-TKIs group; E + T group, Endostar + EGFR-TKIs group. CI, confidence interval; EGFR-TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor; HR, hazard ratio; mPFS, median progression-free survival; PFS, progression-free survival.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2024;74:229-63. 10.3322/caac.21834 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, et al. The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Genetic, Clinical and Radiologic Advances Since the 2004 Classification. J Thorac Oncol 2015;10:1243-60. 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000630 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosell R, Karachaliou N. Large-scale screening for somatic mutations in lung cancer. Lancet 2016;387:1354-6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01125-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herbst RS, Morgensztern D, Boshoff C. The biology and management of non-small cell lung cancer. Nature 2018;553:446-54. 10.1038/nature25183 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fukuoka M, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, et al. Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS). J Clin Oncol 2011;29:2866-74. 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.4235 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources