Efficacy and Safety of Penetrating Keratoplasty and Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in Corneal Macular Dystrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 40809355
- PMCID: PMC12349984
- DOI: 10.1155/joph/8867750
Efficacy and Safety of Penetrating Keratoplasty and Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in Corneal Macular Dystrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Purpose: To compare efficacy and safety for deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) versus penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for macular corneal dystrophy. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) to identify eligible studies reported up to January 2024. Using STATA 17, we reported outcomes as log risk ratios (log RRs) or mean difference (SMD) and confidence intervals (CIs). A p value ≤ 0.05 is considered statistically significant. Results: DALK was superior to PK in terms of BCVA (Hedge's g: -0.32 with 95% CI [-0.64, -0.01], p=0.05), PK was associated with a higher risk of graft rejection in comparison with DALK (log RR: 1.21 with 95% CI [0.25, 2.18], p=0.01), and there was no difference between PK and DALK in terms of risk of glaucoma, cataract (log RR: -0.02 with 95% CI [-1.00, 0.95], p=0.96), and (log RR: 0.09 with 95% CI [-0.53, 0.71], p=0.78). The pooled data were homogeneous (I 2 = 0%; p=0.84), respectively. Conclusion: This study suggests that PK, compared to DALK, is associated with worse visual outcomes, with a lower risk of recurrence and a higher risk of graft rejection in macular corneal dystrophy patients.
Keywords: corneal macular dystrophy; corneal transplant; deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; penetrating keratoplasty; stromal dystrophy.
Copyright © 2025 Abdelaziz A. Awad et al. Journal of Ophthalmology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Penetrating Keratoplasty versus Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty for Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 27,018 Eyes.Semin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul;40(5):364-381. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2025.2457583. Epub 2025 Feb 13. Semin Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 39943883
-
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for treating keratoconus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 22;2014(7):CD009700. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009700.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25055058 Free PMC article.
-
Endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;2014(2):CD008420. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008420.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24526345 Free PMC article.
-
Penetrating keratoplasty versus deep anteriror lamellar keratoplasty for macular corneal dystrophy: A meta-analysis.Surv Ophthalmol. 2025 May-Jun;70(3):480-488. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.12.005. Epub 2024 Dec 19. Surv Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 39709033 Review.
-
Immunosuppressants for the prophylaxis of corneal graft rejection after penetrating keratoplasty.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 27;2015(8):CD007603. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007603.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26313245 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Al Faran M., Tabbara K. Corneal Dystrophies Among Patients Undergoing Keratoplasty in Saudi Arabia. Cornea . 1991;10(1):13–16. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources