Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 30:13:1594995.
doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1594995. eCollection 2025.

Mouse and human embryonic genome activation initiate at the one-cell stage

Affiliations

Mouse and human embryonic genome activation initiate at the one-cell stage

Maki Asami et al. Front Cell Dev Biol. .

Abstract

At the moment of their union, fertilizing gametes (sperm and oocyte) are transcriptionally silent: gene expression has to be initiated within the resulting embryo, a process termed embryonic genome activation, EGA. Until recently, EGA was believed to occur at the two-cell stage (mouse) or four-to-eight-cell stage (human), but new evidence from single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq) suggests that it initiates at the one-cell stage in both species. Precise time-course scRNA-seq of mouse one-cell embryos revealed an EGA program referred to as immediate EGA, iEGA: iEGA occurred from within 4 h of fertilization, mainly from the maternal genome, with paternal genomic transcription from ∼10 h. Significant low-magnitude upregulation similarly occurred in healthy human one-cell embryos. In both species, new transcripts were canonically spliced, and expression predicted embryonic processes and regulatory transcription factors (TFs) associated with cancer, including MYC/c-Myc. Blocking their activities in mouse one-cell embryos induced acute developmental arrest and disrupted iEGA. Inhibiting c-Myc induced upregulation of hundreds of genes, implying that they are normatively repressed, a phenomenon we term embryonic genome repression, EGR. iEGA is downregulated coincidentally with a subsequent, higher-amplitude wave of gene expression (referred to as 'major EGA' or 'major ZGA') in two-cell (mouse) or 4-8-cell (human) embryos. We suggest that iEGA is continuous with gene expression previously termed 'minor EGA' (or 'minor ZGA') and that the regulation of iEGA and major EGA are distinctive. The pattern of gene upregulation in iEGA illuminates processes involved at the onset of development, with implications for epigenetic inheritance, stem cell-derived embryos and cancer.

Keywords: embryonic genome activation (EGA); embryonic genome repression (EGR); fertilization; immediate EGA; one-cell embryo; single-cell RNA-sequencing; transcription; zygotic genome activation (ZGA).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Expression profiles of candidate major EGA activating TF mRNAs during iEGA. (A) Klf17, Obox5, Ccnt2 and Yap1 are iEGA genes whose levels increase (Asami et al., 2023). Y-axis: log2FC. (B) Other predicted major EGA TF mRNA levels do not change, or (C) decrease. For all analyses, FDR<5%. (D) The succession of pathways predicted by iEGA (FDR<5%) include tRNA charging (e.g., EARS2, HARS), G2/M checkpoint-associated genes (e.g., CHEK1, CKS1B), DNA methylation-associated genes (e.g., HIST1H4A, SAP30), IGF signaling-associated genes (e.g., CSNK2A1, IGFBP4), genes associated with the molecular mechanism of cancer (e.g., AKT1, WNT4) and G1/S checkpoint-associated genes (e.g., CCNE2, TP53). (E) Predicted mouse and human gene activators in iEGA and major EGA (distinct waves of transcription). Mouse and human iEGA profiles overlap. Transcription regulators were inferred by IPA of mouse iEGA (FDR<5%) at 4, 6, 8 and 12 h, and are indicated where they are first predicted to act.

Similar articles

References

    1. Abe K., Yamamoto R., Franke V., Cao M., Suzuki Y., Suzuki M. G., et al. (2015). The first murine zygotic transcription is promiscuous and uncoupled from splicing and 3' processing. EMBO J. 34, 1523–1537. 10.15252/embj.201490648 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abe K. I., Funaya S., Tsukioka D., Kawamura M., Suzuki Y., Suzuki M. G., et al. (2018). Minor zygotic gene activation is essential for mouse preimplantation development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115, E6780–E6788. 10.1073/pnas.1804309115 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adenot P. G., Mercier Y., Renard J. P., Thompson E. M. (1997). Differential H4 acetylation of paternal and maternal chromatin precedes DNA replication and differential transcriptional activity in pronuclei of 1-cell mouse embryos. Development 124, 4615–4625. 10.1242/dev.124.22.4615 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alexandrova N., Niklinski J., Bliskovsky V., Otterson G. A., Blake M., Kaye F. J., et al. (1995). The N-terminal domain of c-Myc associates with alpha-tubulin and microtubules in vivo and in vitro . Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 5188–5195. 10.1128/MCB.15.9.5188 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ancelin K., Syx L., Borensztein M., Ranisavljevic N., Vassilev I., Briseño-Roa L., et al. (2016). Maternal LSD1/KDM1A is an essential regulator of chromatin and transcription landscapes during zygotic genome activation. Elife 5, e08851. 10.7554/eLife.08851 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources