Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 16;2(8):1704-1713.
doi: 10.1021/acsestair.5c00119. eCollection 2025 Aug 8.

Traffic-Emitted Amines Promote New Particle Formation at Roadsides

Affiliations

Traffic-Emitted Amines Promote New Particle Formation at Roadsides

James Brean et al. ACS EST Air. .

Abstract

New particle formation (NPF) is a major source of atmospheric aerosol particles, significantly influencing particle number concentrations in urban environments. High condensation and coagulation sinks at highly trafficked roadside sites should suppress NPF due to the low survival probability of clusters and new particles, however, observations show that roadside NPF is frequent and intense. Here, we investigate NPF at an urban background and roadside site in Central Europe using simultaneous measurements of sulfuric acid, amines, highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs), and particle number size distributions. We demonstrate that sulfuric acid and amines, particularly traffic-derived C2-amines, are the primary participants in particle formation. C2-amine concentrations at the roadside are enhanced by over a factor of 4 relative to the background, overcoming the effect of enhanced coagulation and condensation sinks. Using machine learning we identify a further but uncertain enhancing role of HOMs. These findings reveal the critical role of traffic emissions in urban NPF.

Keywords: NPF; aerosol; nucleation; pollution; traffic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

1
1
Diel cycles of particles and gases at the background and roadside sites: (a) the particle number size distribution; (b) concentrations of sulfuric acid dimer and monomer, as well as extremely low volatility organic compounds (ELVOC) and ultralow volatility organic compounds (ULVOC) as measured by NO3 CIMS, alongside the ACDC-modeled sulfuric acid dimer-DMA cluster concentration; (c) amines as measured by NO3 CIMS; (d) black carbon, measured by MAAP and condensation sink (CS) as calculated from the particle number size distribution; (e) modeled and measured J1.5 from ACDC and the particle number size distribution, respectively.
2
2
Mechanism of particle formation at the roadside and background: (a) relationship between H2SO4 dimer and C2-amines as measured by NO3 CIMS; (b) H2SO4 dimer plotted against H2SO4 monomer from our measurements, alongside CLOUD chamber data from ref (c) J 1.5 and J 1.7 versus H2SO4 from our measurements, as well as CLOUD chamber studies. Purple points from ref pink and light green points from ref (d) J 1.5 plotted versus (H2SO4)2 2·C2-amine0.5·ULVOC for both measurement sites.
3
3
Quantitative performance of the machine learning models. (a) Learning curve for the mean absolute error (MAE) of the J 3. For each training size the mean value and variance are obtained by training the model five times by randomly reshuffling the data set; (b) correlation between the measured and predicted J3 (cm–3 s–1) of the best performing models of the five data set random reshuffles for the background site and roadside site.
4
4
Top 14 most impactful features for the prediction of J 3 with the RF models. (a) SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values for the background model; (b) SHAP values of the roadside model. Higher SHAP values indicate that the feature increased the model’s prediction of J 3, with color showing whether high or low values of the feature caused that effect. The features are ranked by their highest mean |SHAP| values, with only the top 14 shown. Midday photochemistry, morning photochemistry, and nighttime chemistry refer to the HOM PMF factors of ref A SHAP value of 0 represents the average J 3 value. Positive SHAP values indicate an increase in J 3, while negative values indicate a decrease. The spread of SHAP values and the color gradient show the strength and direction of the correlation, with a clear gradient suggesting a strong positive or negative relationship.
5
5
Simulated particle formation rates under varying scenarios. Hourly daytime maxima in J 1.5 are presented. J 1.5 was modeled using the mean cycle of sulfuric acid, C2-amine (assumed to be dimethylamine), temperature, relative humidity, and condensation sink on NPF days at each site. The leftmost bar represents background conditions, the rightmost bar depicts roadside conditions, and the middle bar shows roadside conditions adjusted to have the same amine concentrations as the background.

Similar articles

References

    1. Cohen A. J.. et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet. 2017;389:1907–1918. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schraufnagel D. E.. The health effects of ultrafine particles. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020;52:311–317. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0403-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. IPCC . Masson-Delmotte, V. ; Zhai, P. ; Pirani, A. ; et al. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., and New York, 2021.
    1. Bousiotis D.. et al. A phenomenology of new particle formation (NPF) at 13 European sites. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2021;21:11905–11925. doi: 10.5194/acp-21-11905-2021. - DOI
    1. Lee S. H.. et al. New Particle Formation in the Atmosphere: From Molecular Clusters to Global Climate. J. Geophys. Res.:Atmos. 2019;124:7098–7146. doi: 10.1029/2018JD029356. - DOI