Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 30:6:1577951.
doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1577951. eCollection 2025.

Do perceived social support mitigate the influence of infertility stigma on fertility quality of life?

Saher Al Sabbah  1 , Ansarullah Tantry  1 , Lisa Bayliss-Pratt  2
Affiliations

Do perceived social support mitigate the influence of infertility stigma on fertility quality of life?

Saher Al Sabbah et al. Front Glob Womens Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Infertility is a medical condition that affects both males and females and can cause the individuals biopsychosocial, spiritual, and medical detriments. Quality of life among such couples or singles is a matter of concern. The question that we need to address is whether infertility affects the quality of life. Does the stigma associated with Infertility deter Infertile females from leading normal lives? This research explores how infertility stigma affects the quality of life of infertile females and whether perceived social support reduces the stress related to stigma thereby contributing to a better quality of life among females battling Infertility in India.

Methods: Participants from Jammu and Kashmir who identified as currently or previously infertile discussed their feelings about fertility stigma, the quality of their fertility-related social support, and their fertility quality of life. Only 302 fully complete questionnaires were obtained from the 351 identified individuals who were given data collection tools. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to treat data.

Results: It was seen that infertility stigma and perceived social support had an impact on fertility quality of life, either directly or indirectly. Infertility quality of life was reduced by stigma (β = -.413, SE = .017, p ≤ .01 level of significance, CI, 95%), and this link was partially mediated by infertile female's perceptions of social support (β = .512, p ≤ .01 level of significance, CI, 95%). In other words, it can be said that the negative effects of infertility stigma were buffered by perceived social support and improved fertility quality of life. Additionally, the sense of stigma was adversely linked with the overall quality of past fertility-related support.

Discussion: The findings of study confirms that perceived social support significantly mitigates the negative impact of infertility-related stigma on fertility quality of life among infertile females, highlighting the crucial role of emotional and social resources in mitigating distress. These findings emphasize the importance of encouraging supportive environment and interventions to enhance quality of life in females experiencing infertility stigma.

Keywords: female's health; fertility quality of life; infertility; infertility stigma; perceived social support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Theoretical foundations of the conceptual model of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SEM model determining the relationship between infertility-related stigma (iS), perceived social support (PSS/PS), and fertility quality of life (FQOL/QL).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Brannigan RE, Fantus RJ, Halpern JA. Fertility preservation in men: a contemporary overview and a look toward emerging technologies. Fertil Steril. (2021) 115(5):1126–39. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barrera N, Omolaoye TS, Du Plessis SS. A contemporary view on global fertility, infertility, and assisted reproductive techniques. In: Vaamonde D, Hackney AC, Garcia-Manso JM, editors. Fertility, Pregnancy, and Wellness. Amsterdam: Elsevier; (2022). p. 93–120. 10.1016/b978-0-12-818309-0.00009-5 - DOI
    1. Polis CB, Cox CM, Tunçalp Ö, McLain AC, Thoma ME. Estimating infertility prevalence in low-to-middle-income countries: an application of a current duration approach to demographic and health survey data. Hum Reprod. (2017) 32(5):1064–74. 10.1093/humrep/dex025 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poongothai J, Gopenath T, Manonayaki S. A386g transition in DAZL gene is not associated with spermatogenic failure in Tamil Nadu, South India. Indian J Hum Genet. (2008) 14(1):16. 10.4103/0971-6866.42322 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Purkayastha N, Sharma H. Prevalence and potential determinants of primary infertility in India: evidence from Indian demographic health survey. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. (2021) 9:162–70. 10.1016/j.cegh.2020.08.008 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources