Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Aug 14;11(3):e005557.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005557.

Efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of iscalimab (CFZ533) in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of iscalimab (CFZ533) in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study

Nan Shen et al. RMD Open. .

Abstract

Background: Iscalimab (CFZ533) is a novel, anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody. This study evaluated the efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of iscalimab versus placebo as add-on to standard-of-care (SoC) therapy in patients with biopsy-proven active proliferative lupus nephritis (LN).

Methods: This was a phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study including patients with a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus with active LN. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either intravenous iscalimab (10 mg/kg) or placebo for 24 weeks on top of SoC for LN. The primary efficacy endpoint was the ratio from baseline in urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) at week 24. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) during treatment and follow-up up to 49 weeks.

Findings: Of the 57 patients (iscalimab, n=39; placebo, n=18) randomised, 31 (54.4%) completed the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was met: at week 24, the relative improvement from baseline in proteinuria (UPCR) was 63.1% and 36.3% in the iscalimab and placebo arms, respectively. UPCR to baseline at week 24 showed a statistically significant reduction of 42.1% in the iscalimab versus placebo arm. Most AEs were of mild to moderate severity in both treatment arms. Overall, seven SAEs were reported in six patients (15.4%) in the iscalimab arm versus four in three patients (16.7%) in the placebo arm.

Interpretation: Iscalimab showed a significant improvement in proteinuria (UPCR) in patients with active LN. Iscalimab was generally well tolerated with the exception of a few severe infections and one case of macrophage-activation syndrome in immunosuppressed and comorbid patients.

Trial registration number: NCT03610516.

Keywords: Autoimmune Diseases; Biological Therapy; Glucocorticoids; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Lupus Nephritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: NS has no potential competing interests. JW-M received consulting fees from GSK and AstraZeneca; payment or honoraria from GSK, AstraZeneca, Otsuka and Alexion; travel assistance or support for attending meetings from Novartis, AstraZeneca and Otsuka; participated on the data safety monitoring or advisory board of GSK, AstraZeneca, Otsuka, Alexion and Novartis. JW-M’s institution received grants or contracts from Novartis towards study site payment. JW-M is a Spokesperson of the German association of nephrology and member of the AWMF. AM received consulting fees from GSK, Roche, Kezar, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer; payment or honoraria from GSK, Roche, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer; participated on the data safety monitoring or advisory board of GSK, Roche, Kezar, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer. MW, RD, CS, JR, RF, PG and TS are employees of Novartis. AS-R was an employee of Novartis at the time of conduct of this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study design. *Iscalimab or placebo 10 mg/kg intravenous on days 1, 15, 29, 57, 85, 113 and 141. **For steroid tapering regimen, refer to online supplemental Table 1 included in the appendix. EOS, end of study; R, randomisation.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Patient disposition. AE, adverse event.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Estimated geometric mean UPCR and UPCR relative reduction (iscalimab improvement from baseline vs placebo improvement from baseline) over time UPCR estimated using first morning void sample, if available, at visit or otherwise using the clinic spot sample. Error bar indicates 80% CI. UPCR, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Percentage of patients with complete and partial renal response at week 24 complete renal remission is defined as UPCR≤0.2 mg/mg as well as eGFR≤25% of baseline and normal urine sediment. Complete response is defined as UPCR ≤0.2 mg/mg and >50% reduction in UPCR versus baseline. Partial response is defined as 2.0>UPCR >0.2 mg/mg and >50% reduction in UPCR versus baseline. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; UPCR, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio.

Similar articles

References

    1. Anders H-J, Ramesh S, Ming-hui Z, et al. Lupus nephritis (primer) Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0141-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hanly JG, O’Keeffe AG, Su L, et al. The frequency and outcome of lupus nephritis: results from an international inception cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016;55:252–62. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev311. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Faurschou M, Dreyer L, Kamper A, et al. Long‐term mortality and renal outcome in a cohort of 100 patients with Lupus Nephritis. Arthritis Care & Research . 2010;62:873–80. doi: 10.1002/acr.20116. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang H. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prevalence of Biopsy-Proven Lupus Nephritis. Arch Rheumatol. 2018;33:17–25. doi: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2017.6127. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parikh SV, Almaani S, Brodsky S, et al. Update on Lupus Nephritis: Core Curriculum 2020. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;76:265–81. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.10.017. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources