Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 14;15(1):29839.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14500-3.

Effects on muscular activity and usability of soft active versus rigid passive back exoskeleton during symmetric lifting tasks

Affiliations

Effects on muscular activity and usability of soft active versus rigid passive back exoskeleton during symmetric lifting tasks

Ting Lei et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Low back injuries are globally prevalent among construction workers, leading to significant economic burdens. Despite various intervention strategies, their effectiveness remains uncertain. This study evaluates a lightweight active soft back exosuit (SV Exosuit) against a passive rigid exosuit (IX BACK) to assess muscle activity and usability. Fifteen healthy participants performed bending and lifting tasks under three conditions: no exosuit, with SV Exosuit, and with IX BACK. Electromyographic (EMG) signals from back extensors were collected, and subjective feedback was obtained using the NASA task load index (NASA-TLX). Results showed that the active exosuit significantly reduced mean and peak EMG levels, while the passive exoskeleton exhibited modest reductions, particularly during unloaded tasks. EMG pattern analysis indicated peak activity occurring within 30-40% of the motion cycle, with IX BACK causing delays in bending without load due to resistance. Overall, both devices alleviated muscle strain, with SV Exosuit providing superior support during loaded tasks. The findings suggest that SV Exosuit's lightweight and effective design make it a preferable option for construction tasks, highlighting the need for further research on its application in real-world settings.

Keywords: Back exoskeleton; Construction health; Exoskeleton comparison; Low back pain; Passive exoskeleton; Soft active exosuit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the (a) Safety vest exosuit (SV Exosuit), and (b) IX BACK.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Position for surface EMG (sEMG) pairs to attach to the back extensors.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean EMG (a) and peak EMG (b) comparisons across the three exosuit conditions.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
EMG curves in the bend down and lift up sessions under the three exosuit conditions.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Subjective ratings on NASA-TLX items across the three back exosuit conditions. MD: mental demand; PD: physical demand; TD: temporal demand; P: performance, higher score for less successful; E: effort; F: and frustration.

Similar articles

References

    1. Adhikari, B. et al. Factors associated with low back pain among construction workers in Nepal: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE16, e0252564. 10.1371/journal.pone.0252564 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chung, J. W. Y. et al. A survey of work-related pain prevalence among construction workers in Hong Kong: A case-control study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health10.3390/ijerph16081404 (2019). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jeong, S. & Lee, B.-H. The moderating effect of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in relation to occupational stress and health-related quality of life of construction workers: A cross-sectional research. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord.25, 147. 10.1186/s12891-024-07216-4 (2024). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Botelho, J. et al. Economic burden of periodontitis in the United States and Europe: An updated estimation. J. Periodontol.93, 373–379. 10.1002/JPER.21-0111 (2022). - PubMed
    1. Carregaro, R. L. et al. Low back pain should be considered a health and research priority in Brazil: Lost productivity and healthcare costs between 2012 to 2016. PLoS ONE15(4), e0230902. 10.1371/journal.pone.0230902 (2020). - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources