Effects on muscular activity and usability of soft active versus rigid passive back exoskeleton during symmetric lifting tasks
- PMID: 40813418
- PMCID: PMC12354768
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-14500-3
Effects on muscular activity and usability of soft active versus rigid passive back exoskeleton during symmetric lifting tasks
Abstract
Low back injuries are globally prevalent among construction workers, leading to significant economic burdens. Despite various intervention strategies, their effectiveness remains uncertain. This study evaluates a lightweight active soft back exosuit (SV Exosuit) against a passive rigid exosuit (IX BACK) to assess muscle activity and usability. Fifteen healthy participants performed bending and lifting tasks under three conditions: no exosuit, with SV Exosuit, and with IX BACK. Electromyographic (EMG) signals from back extensors were collected, and subjective feedback was obtained using the NASA task load index (NASA-TLX). Results showed that the active exosuit significantly reduced mean and peak EMG levels, while the passive exoskeleton exhibited modest reductions, particularly during unloaded tasks. EMG pattern analysis indicated peak activity occurring within 30-40% of the motion cycle, with IX BACK causing delays in bending without load due to resistance. Overall, both devices alleviated muscle strain, with SV Exosuit providing superior support during loaded tasks. The findings suggest that SV Exosuit's lightweight and effective design make it a preferable option for construction tasks, highlighting the need for further research on its application in real-world settings.
Keywords: Back exoskeleton; Construction health; Exoskeleton comparison; Low back pain; Passive exoskeleton; Soft active exosuit.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Effects of a Passive Back-Support Exosuit on Objective and Subjective Measures of Human Performance During a Simulated Bush-Crop Harvesting Task.J Agromedicine. 2025 Jul;30(3):546-557. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2025.2470257. Epub 2025 Feb 23. J Agromedicine. 2025. PMID: 39988870
-
User Experiences and Adoption Factors for a Back-Support Exosuit in Automotive Logistics: Results from Field Testing up to 18 Months.IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2025 Jul-Sep;13(3):191-199. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2025.2491485. Epub 2025 Apr 15. IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2025. PMID: 40235114
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD008796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008796.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27030386 Free PMC article.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
References
-
- Botelho, J. et al. Economic burden of periodontitis in the United States and Europe: An updated estimation. J. Periodontol.93, 373–379. 10.1002/JPER.21-0111 (2022). - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources