Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 14.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11909-2. Online ahead of print.

Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of right ventricular and left atrial function for early diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Affiliations

Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of right ventricular and left atrial function for early diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Ting-Tse Lin et al. Eur Radiol. .

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the role of right ventricular (RV) maladaptive response to increased afterload in the early diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET). This study evaluates biventricular function and its association with exercise performance in HFpEF.

Materials and methods: We prospectively recruited 145 patients with suspected HFpEF from two centers, of whom 113 underwent echocardiography, iCPET, and CMR. Patients met the 2016 European Society of Cardiology HFpEF criteria, with iCPET confirming HFpEF as a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) > 15 mmHg at rest and > 25 mmHg at peak exercise. The diagnostic performance of CMR parameters was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC).

Results: Among the 113 patients, 72 had HFpEF (68 ± 10 years) and 41 were non-HFpEF (66 ± 11 years). HFpEF patients exhibited significantly reduced resting pulmonary artery compliance. CMR-derived RV longitudinal strain and left atrial (LA) reservoir strain had the highest diagnostic accuracy for HFpEF (AUC 0.805 and 0.776, respectively). A sex disparity was observed in the LA reservoir strain's diagnostic performance, with higher accuracy in males (AUC 0.801) compared to females (AUC 0.559). Additionally, impaired LA reservoir and booster strains, correlated with reduced exercise capacity and increased PCWP during exercise, highlighting their clinical relevance.

Conclusions: RV systolic dysfunction and impaired LA strain serve as early HFpEF markers. The more pronounced LA dysfunction in males suggests potential sex-specific differences, underscoring the need to integrate RV and LA strain assessment into HFpEF diagnostics and personalized treatment approaches.

Key points: Question Can cardiac MRI (CMR)-derived RV strain and LA reservoir strain improve the early diagnosis of HFpEF in symptomatic patients with preserved ejection fraction? Findings CMR-derived RV longitudinal strain and LA reservoir strain effectively differentiate early HFpEF; diagnostic accuracy of LA strain varies significantly by sex. Clinical relevance CMR-based RV and LA strain measurements enhance early HFpEF detection, with higher diagnostic accuracy in males, supporting sex-specific diagnostic strategies for timely and personalized heart failure care.

Keywords: Atrial function (left); Cardiac imaging (magnetic resonance); Heart failure (diastolic); Sex factors; Ventricular function (right).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standards. Guarantor: The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Lian-Yu Lin. Conflict of interest: The corresponding author has full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Conflict of interest is none. Statistics and biometry: Ting-Tse Lin has significant statistical expertise. Informed consent: Written informed consent was obtained from all patients in this study. Ethical approval: The research was approved by the institutional review board of the NTUH Ethics Committee with reference number: 201712162RIND. Study subjects or cohorts overlap: We confirm that there is no overlap of study subjects or cohorts in this study. Methodology: Prospective (case-control) Diagnostic and prognostic Multicenter study

Similar articles

References

    1. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M et al (2021) 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 42:3599–3726 - PubMed
    1. Hieda M, Sarma S, Hearon Jr.CM et al (2020) Increased myocardial stiffness in patients with high-risk left ventricular hypertrophy: the hallmark of stage-B heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 141:115–123 - PubMed
    1. Guazzi M, Naeije R (2021) Right heart phenotype in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail 14:e007840 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Gorter TM, Hoendermis ES, van Veldhuisen DJ et al (2016) Right ventricular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail 18:1472–1487 - PubMed
    1. Nagueh SF, Shah DJ (2020) Echocardiography first, but here comes CMR for grading left ventricular diastolic function. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 13:2543–2545 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources