Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 14;25(1):2755.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23635-x.

Independent and combined relationships between nighttime light exposure, air pollution, PM2.5 constituents, greenness and diabetes or high blood sugar: a national prospective cohort study

Affiliations

Independent and combined relationships between nighttime light exposure, air pollution, PM2.5 constituents, greenness and diabetes or high blood sugar: a national prospective cohort study

Siyu Qing et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Diabetes or high blood sugar (D/HBS) is a major global public health challenge, with a particularly high burden among middle-aged and older adults in China. While traditional risk factors (e.g., obesity, sedentary behavior) are well-studied, the impacts of environmental factors such as nighttime light (NL), air pollution, and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) on D/HBS remain underexplored.

Methods: Using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, 2011-2015), we included 11,865 participants aged ≥ 45 years without baseline D/HBS. Cox proportional hazards models were employed to evaluate the independent effects of NL, air pollutants (PM1, PM2.5, NO2, etc.), and NDVI on D/HBS risk, adjusting for confounders. Interaction effects, joint effects, and mediation effects were further analyzed.

Results: The median follow-up duration was 4.0 years. Among the 11,865 baseline participants, 371 developed incident D/HBS. NL was significantly associated with increased D/HBS risk (per IQR increase: HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.06-1.26). High exposure to PM2.5 (Q4: HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.06-2.01) and NO2 (Q4: HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.07-1.92) elevated risk, while higher NDVI (Q3: HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.37-0.72) showed a protective effect. Synergistic effects were observed between NL and PM2.5 (RERI = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.13-1.09) or NO3- (RERI = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.11-1.08). Mediation analyses indicated that air pollutants, specifically NH4+ (proportion = - 68.3%) and NO3- (proportion = - 64.1%), partially attenuated the protective role of NDVI.

Conclusions: NL and air pollution are independent risk factors for D/HBS, with synergistic effects exacerbating disease risk. NDVI confers protection by reducing pollutant exposure. Comprehensive strategies targeting light pollution control, air quality improvement, and optimized green space planning are imperative. Future studies should integrate individualized exposure assessments and elucidate causal environmental-metabolic pathways.

Keywords: Air pollution; Diabetes/high blood sugar; Greenness; Nighttime light exposure; Prospective cohort study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The CHARLS cohort received primary ethical approval from the Biomedical Ethics Review Committee of Peking University (IRB00001052-11015). Participants provided informed consent, with data anonymized for confidentiality. This study used de-identified secondary data from CHARLS and adhered to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. For this specific secondary data analysis, the research protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of Xinxiang Medical University (No: XYLL-2019072). No separate ethical approval was required for the analysis of this existing, anonymized dataset beyond the approvals obtained, as this study constituted secondary analysis of previously collected and approved data under conditions that met relevant institutional and national guidelines for exemption. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Exposure-response curves of NL, air pollutants, and NDVI with risk of D/HBS. A Exposure-response curves of NL with risk of D/HBS; B Exposure-response curves of PM1 with risk of D/HBS; C Exposure-response curves of PM2.5 with risk of D/HBS; D Exposure-response curves of PM10 with risk of D/HBS; E Exposure-response curves of NO2 with risk of D/HBS; F Exposure-response curves of O3 with risk of D/HBS; G Exposure-response curves of BC with risk of D/HBS; H Exposure-response curves of NH4+ with risk of D/HBS; I Exposure-response curves of OM with risk of D/HBS; J Exposure-response curves of SO42- with risk of D/HBS; K Exposure-response curves of NO3- with risk of D/HBS; L Exposure-response curves of NDVI with risk of D/HBS. Abbreviations: D/HBS = Diabetes or high blood sugar; NL = nighttime light; PM1 = particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤1 μm; PM2.5 = particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 μm; PM10= particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤10 μm; NO2 = nitrogen dioxide; O3 = ozone; BC = black carbon; NH4+= ammonium; OM = organic matter; SO42− = sulfate; NO3= nitrate; NDVI = normalized difference vegetation index. Adjusted for age, gender, marital status, education level, smoking status, alcohol consumption, sleep state and residential area. Solid line represents point estimates and dashed lines represent 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Associations of NL, air pollutants, and NDVI with risk of D/HBS. Abbreviations: D/HBS = Diabetes or high blood sugar; NL = nighttime light; PM1 = particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤1 μm; PM2.5 = particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 μm; PM10 = particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤10 μm; NO2 = nitrogen dioxide; O3 = ozone; BC = black carbon; NH4+ = ammonium; OM = organic matter; SO42− = sulfate; NO3 = nitrate; NDVI = normalized difference vegetation index. Model 1 was adjusted for age and gender. Model 2 included additional adjustments for marital status and education level. Model 3 further controlled for smoking status, alcohol consumption, sleep state and residential area. Solid points represent point estimates, and the line segments represent 95% confidence intervals

Similar articles

References

    1. Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M, Ogurtsova K, Duncan BB, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183:109119. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Magliano DJ, Boyko EJ. IDF diabetes atlas 10th edition scientific committee. Idf diabetes atlas. 10th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2021.
    1. GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators. Global, regional, and National burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet (lond Engl). 2023;402:203–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bai A, Tao J, Tao L, Liu J. Prevalence and risk factors of diabetes among adults aged 45 years or older in china: a National cross-sectional study. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2021;4:e00265. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen S, Ling Y, Zhou F, Qiao X, Reinhardt JD. Trajectories of cognitive function among people aged 45 years and older living with diabetes in china: results from a nationally representative longitudinal study (2011 ~ 2018). PLoS One. 2024;19:e0299316. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources