Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 15.
doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01335-8. Online ahead of print.

Role of left lateral prefrontal cortex in positive emotion regulation: Insights from dyslexia

Affiliations

Role of left lateral prefrontal cortex in positive emotion regulation: Insights from dyslexia

Eleanor R Palser et al. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. .

Abstract

Emotion regulation emerges during childhood and engages prefrontal brain systems. While most developmental studies focus on the neural underpinnings of negative emotion regulation, less is known about the neuroanatomical correlates of positive emotion regulation. In adults, prefrontal areas in the left hemisphere are critical for positive emotion regulation, but whether this association is present in children is unknown. We investigated whether smaller gray matter volume in left prefrontal regions related to worse positive emotion regulation in children with and without dyslexia. Because dyslexia is a neurodevelopmental disorder of reading in which there may be greater variability in left prefrontal structures, it offers a unique window into the neural basis of positive emotion regulation. Sixty-nine children (ages 7-13) were asked to hide their feelings while watching film clips that elicited either amusement or disgust, and evaluate their emotion regulation performance. Parents reported on children's everyday emotion regulation. Across the sample, children with smaller volumes in left prefrontal regions (i.e., lateral orbitofrontal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) had greater facial behavior (i.e., suggesting worse positive emotion regulation) yet more positive self-reported emotion regulation success during the amusement trial (i.e., suggesting more favorable self-evaluation). These regions did not relate to disgust regulation, however. Children with more positive views of their emotion regulation success also had better everyday parent-reported emotion regulation. Results suggest that positive emotion regulation in childhood relies on left prefrontal regions and a more optimistic view of one's emotion regulation abilities, regardless of one's actual emotional behavior, may confer real-world advantages.

Keywords: Adolescence; Approach; Laterality; Learning differences; Positivity; Suppression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval: The study protocol was approved by the UCSF Human Research Protection Program. Procedures were conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Consent to participate: Participants provided verbal assent and their guardians provided written informed consent. Consent to publish: As part of informed consent procedures, participants consented for their deidentified data to be published in a journal article. Conflicting or competing interests: The authors have no conflicting or competing interests to disclose.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ahern, G. L., & Schwartz, G. E. (1985). Differential lateralization for positive and negative emotion in the human brain: EEG spectral analysis. Neuropsychologia, 23(6), 745–755. - PubMed
    1. Ahmed, S. P., Bittencourt-Hewitt, A., & Sebastian, C. L. (2015). Neurocognitive bases of emotion regulation development in adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 11–25. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2014). Inhibition andthe right inferior frontal cortex: One decade on. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 177–185. - PubMed
    1. Aron, A. R. (2007). The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. The Neuroscientist, 13(3), 214–228. - PubMed
    1. Aron, A. R., & Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: Role of the subthalamic nucleus. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(9), 2424–2433. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources