Randomized phase II comparison of single-agent carboplatin versus combination of carboplatin and everolimus for advanced triple negative breast cancer
- PMID: 40817986
- DOI: 10.1007/s10549-025-07802-7
Randomized phase II comparison of single-agent carboplatin versus combination of carboplatin and everolimus for advanced triple negative breast cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are associated with a high frequency of PTEN loss, which can lead to activation of the mTOR pathway and tumor proliferation but may be reversible with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus. A prior phase II single-arm trial of carboplatin and everolimus in patients with advanced TNBC demonstrated good tolerability and preliminary efficacy.
Patients and methods: A phase II randomized trial in patients with advanced TNBC, with 0-3 prior lines of therapy, was conducted. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive carboplatin and everolimus or carboplatin alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety.
Results: Between 2015 and 2022, 59 patients were randomized to carboplatin/everolimus (n = 38) or carboplatin alone (n = 21). The median age of the population was 62 years and 68% had received at least one prior line of therapy. Median PFS was significantly improved in patients who received carboplatin/everolimus (4.7 months) versus carboplatin alone (4.2 months; HR:0.49; 95% CI: 0.25-0.98; p = 0.0390). OS was 17.6 months with the combination and 14.6 months with carboplatin alone (HR:1.17; 95% CI: 0.59-2.30; p = 0.6593). The most common adverse events (AEs) on the combination included thrombocytopenia, anemia, leukopenia, and neutropenia.
Conclusion: The combination of carboplatin and everolimus in this study reduced the risk of progression or death by 52%. The regimen was well tolerated and provides a promising treatment option for patients with advanced TNBC.
Keywords: Metastatic; Targeted therapy; Triple negative breast cancer.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: A.T. reports a consulting/advisory role for Puma Biotechnology, Immunomedics, AstraZeneca, Novartis, eisai and Roche/Genentech. All other authors report no relevant conflicts of interest. Ethical approval: The protocol was approved by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai’s Institutional Review Boards and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent: All patients provided written informed consent.
Similar articles
-
Atezolizumab in Combination With Carboplatin and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: The TBCRC 043 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;10(2):193-201. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5424. JAMA Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38095878 Free PMC article.
-
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29405038 Free PMC article.
-
Ipatasertib combined with non-taxane chemotherapy for patients with previously treated advanced triple-negative breast cancer: the PATHFINDER phase IIa trial.Breast Cancer Res. 2025 Aug 6;27(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13058-025-02089-4. Breast Cancer Res. 2025. PMID: 40770648 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Platinum-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 23;6(6):CD003374. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003374.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28643430 Free PMC article.
-
Platinum-based chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 8;9(9):CD014805. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014805.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37681577 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Foulkes WD, Smith IE, Reis-Filho JS (2010) Triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 363(20):1938–1948 - PubMed
-
- Bianchini G, De Angelis C, Licata L, Gianni L (2022) Treatment landscape of triple-negative breast cancer—expanded options, evolving needs. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 19(2):91–113 - PubMed
-
- Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Miller KD, Kramer JL, Newman LA, Minihan A, Jemal A, Siegel RL (2022) Breast cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 72(6):524–541 - PubMed
-
- Cortes J, Rugo HS, Cescon DW, Im SA, Yusof MM, Gallardo C, Lipatov O, Barrios CH, Perez-Garcia J, Iwata H et al (2022) Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 387(3):217–226 - PubMed
-
- Bardia A, Hurvitz SA, Tolaney SM, Loirat D, Punie K, Oliveira M, Brufsky A, Sardesai SD, Kalinsky K, Zelnak AB et al (2021) Sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 384(16):1529–1541 - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous