Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov;214(1):49-58.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07792-6. Epub 2025 Aug 17.

High-resolution microCT to assess breast microcalcification morphometry by histologic lesion subtype and radiologic classification

Affiliations

High-resolution microCT to assess breast microcalcification morphometry by histologic lesion subtype and radiologic classification

Sarah Schrup et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess associations of 3D morphometry of breast calcifications, determined using high-resolution microCT, with underlying histopathology and evaluate the potential for classifying tissue calcifications as an aid in optimizing identification and diagnosis of the most severe pathology in a biopsy.

Methods: We compared morphometry of calcifications in tissue blocks (n = 156) of benign breast disease (n = 74), ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 39), and ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive breast cancer (n = 43) using (10 µm) microCT. Matched sections were reviewed microscopically to define lesion(s) in which calcifications were embedded. 3D reconstructions of calcifications were reviewed independently by two masked radiologists to assess the need for biopsy and calcification morphology. Calcification morphometry was compared to pathologic diagnosis using linear mixed models.

Results: A total of 12,216 calcifications (IQR 9-66 per specimen) were analyzed. Individual breast cancer-associated calcifications were significantly larger than benign breast disease-associated calcifications (padjusted = 0.012) and calcification volume was positively associated with grade of ductal carcinoma in situ (Ptrend = 0.009). Structure model index revealed more cylindrical shape in breast cancer calcifications versus benign breast disease calcifications (padjusted = 0.008). Re-analysis by the specific microscopic lesion containing the calcification, rather than the most severe diagnosis per biopsy, strengthened associations. Radiologists agreed on biopsy recommendation in 92% of microCT images, while achieving sensitivities of 53.1% and 54.3%. and specificities of 50.0% and 54.1%.

Conclusion: Our analysis provides proof-of-concept that morphometry of tissue calcifications varies by lesion type, suggesting that future studies may enable development of a pathologic classification linked to diagnosis and mammographic findings.

Keywords: 3D; Breast; Mammography; MicroCT; Microcalcifications; Morphology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Ethics approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Mayo Clinic IRB (75–87).

Similar articles

References

    1. Grimm LJ, Johnson DY, Johnson KS et al (2017) Suspicious breast calcifications undergoing stereotactic biopsy in women ages 70 and over: breast cancer incidence by BI-RADS descriptors. Eur Radiol 27:2275–2281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4617-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azam S, Eriksson M, Sjölander A et al (2021) Mammographic microcalcifications and risk of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 125:759–765. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01459-x - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Schrup S, Hardway H, Vierkant RA et al (2024) Microcalcifications in benign breast biopsies: association with lesion type and risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 208:543–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07448-x - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. (2013) ACR BI-RADS Fifth Edition Quick Reference
    1. Spak DA, Plaxco JS, Santiago L et al (2017) BI-RADS® fifth edition: a summary of changes. Diagn Interv Imaging 98:179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2017.01.001 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources