Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Dec;57(1):2545562.
doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2545562. Epub 2025 Aug 17.

Sugammadex versus neostigmine on postoperative adverse respiratory events in elderly patients undergoing lung resection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Yuxin Wang  1   2   3 , Xiang Li  1   2 , Huimin Deng  1   2 , Di Feng  1   2 , Liuyuan Zhao  1   2 , Feihong Lin  1   2 , Tian Jin  1   2 , Sheng Wang  1   2 , Xin Lv  1   2 , Juan Wei  1   2
Affiliations

Sugammadex versus neostigmine on postoperative adverse respiratory events in elderly patients undergoing lung resection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Yuxin Wang et al. Ann Med. 2025 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Elderly patients undergoing lung resection are particularly susceptible to postoperative adverse respiratory events (AREs), due to age-related physiological decline and a higher incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB). Sugammadex is a selective relaxant binding agent that enables rapid and complete reversal of aminosteroid neuromuscular blocking agents such as rocuronium, offering potential advantages over traditional acetylcholinesterase inhibitors like neostigmine. However, evidence directly comparing the impact of sugammadex versus neostigmine on clinically relevant respiratory outcomes, particularly AREs in elderly patients undergoing lung resection remains limited.

Methods and analysis: This is a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial involving 530 elderly patients (≥65 years old) scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery requiring one-lung ventilation. Patients will be 1:1 randomized to receive sugammadex or neostigmine for neuromuscular blockade reversal. The primary outcome is a composite of AREs occurring in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes include time from neuromuscular to extubation, the composite of ARE and rescue measures, PACU length of stay, postoperative pulmonary and extra-pulmonary complications, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission, chest drainage tube duration, hospital length of stay, and mortality. All patients will be followed up until 30 days after surgery. The primary analysis will be conducted on a modified intention-to-treat basis.

Discussion: This trial is designed to address a critical gap in perioperative care for elderly patients undergoing lung resection by directly comparing sugammadex and neostigmine in terms of clinically meaningful respiratory outcomes. While previous studies have primarily focused on pharmacokinetic profiles or surrogate markers such as train-of-four recovery time, evidence regarding the impact of these agents on postoperative AREs remains limited. Given the growing elderly surgical population and the high incidence of RNMB and pulmonary complications in this group, the findings of this study will offer valuable insight into optimizing neuromuscular blockade reversal strategies.

Trial registration: This study is registered at Chinese clinical trial registry (ChiCTR2400094005).

Keywords: Adverse respiratory events; elderly; lung resection; neostigmine; sugammadex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flowchart. ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; VATS: video-assisted thoracic lung surgery.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, et al. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. 2025;75(1):10–45. doi: 10.3322/caac.21871. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adams SJ, Stone E, Baldwin DR, et al. Lung cancer screening. Lancet. 2023;401(10374):390–408. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01694-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boffa DJ, Kosinski AS, Furnary AP, et al. Minimally invasive lung cancer surgery performed by thoracic surgeons as effective as thoracotomy. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(23):2378–2385. doi: 10.1200/jco.2018.77.8977. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shelley B, Glass A, Keast T, et al. Perioperative cardiovascular pathophysiology in patients undergoing lung resection surgery: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2023;130(1):e66–e79. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.06.035. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vishneski SR, Saha AK, Tran LC, et al. Risk factors for administration of additional neuromuscular block reversal in adults undergoing general anaesthesia: a single centre retrospective case-control study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025;25(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03009-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms