Psychological inoculation improves resilience to and reduces willingness to share vaccine misinformation
- PMID: 40820144
- PMCID: PMC12358572
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-09462-5
Psychological inoculation improves resilience to and reduces willingness to share vaccine misinformation
Abstract
Vaccine misinformation endangers public health by contributing to reduced vaccine uptake. We developed a short online game to reduce people's susceptibility to vaccine misinformation. Building on inoculation theory, the Bad Vaxx game exposes people to weakened doses of manipulation techniques commonly used in vaccine misinformation and to strategies to identify these techniques. Across three preregistered randomized controlled trials (N = 2,326), we find that the game significantly improves participants' ability to discern vaccine misinformation from non-misinformation, their confidence in their ability to do so, and the quality of their sharing decisions. Further, taking the perspective of a character fighting as opposed to spreading misinformation is more effective on some outcome measures. In line with the learning goals of the intervention, we show that participants improve their ability to correctly identify the use of specific misinformation techniques. This insight is important because teaching manipulation technique recognition is not only effective to help evaluate information about vaccines, but also more viable than trying to debunk myriads of constantly-evolving myths. Our findings suggest that a short, low-cost, gamified intervention can increase resilience to vaccine misinformation.
Keywords: Gamification; Inoculation theory; Misinformation; Technique recognition; Vaccine.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: All experimental protocols were approved by the Stanford University Institutional Review Board (protocol number 59740), the Cambridge Psychology Research Ethics Committee (application numbers PRE.2021.010, PRE.2021.065), and the Duke University Campus Institutional Review Board (protocol number 2021–0209). Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Consent for publication: Participants consented to their data being used for research publications.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40232221 Free PMC article.
-
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28169420 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions aimed at communities to inform and/or educate about early childhood vaccination.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 19;2014(11):CD010232. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010232.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25408540 Free PMC article.
-
The complex landscape of vaccine hesitancy and hesitant adopters: Quantitative predictors and thematic insights into COVID-19 vaccine attitudes.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2511350. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2511350. Epub 2025 Jun 20. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025. PMID: 40540028
References
-
- Bruns, R., Hosangadi, D., Trotochaud, M. & Sell, T. K. COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and disinformation costs and estimated $50 to $300 million each day. Tech. Rep. October (2021). URL https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/sites/default/files/2023-02/20211020....
-
- Myers, M. G. & Pineda, D. in Misinformation about Vaccines (eds Barrett, A. D. & Stanberry, L. R.) Vaccines for Biodefense and Emerging and Neglected Diseases Ch. 17, 255–270 (Academic Press, London, 2009).
-
- Allen, J., Watts, D. J. & Rand, D. G. Quantifying the impact of misinformation and vaccine-skeptical content on Facebook. Science384, eadk3451 (2024). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials