Psychological inoculation improves resilience to and reduces willingness to share vaccine misinformation
- PMID: 40820144
- PMCID: PMC12358572
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-09462-5
Psychological inoculation improves resilience to and reduces willingness to share vaccine misinformation
Abstract
Vaccine misinformation endangers public health by contributing to reduced vaccine uptake. We developed a short online game to reduce people's susceptibility to vaccine misinformation. Building on inoculation theory, the Bad Vaxx game exposes people to weakened doses of manipulation techniques commonly used in vaccine misinformation and to strategies to identify these techniques. Across three preregistered randomized controlled trials (N = 2,326), we find that the game significantly improves participants' ability to discern vaccine misinformation from non-misinformation, their confidence in their ability to do so, and the quality of their sharing decisions. Further, taking the perspective of a character fighting as opposed to spreading misinformation is more effective on some outcome measures. In line with the learning goals of the intervention, we show that participants improve their ability to correctly identify the use of specific misinformation techniques. This insight is important because teaching manipulation technique recognition is not only effective to help evaluate information about vaccines, but also more viable than trying to debunk myriads of constantly-evolving myths. Our findings suggest that a short, low-cost, gamified intervention can increase resilience to vaccine misinformation.
Keywords: Gamification; Inoculation theory; Misinformation; Technique recognition; Vaccine.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: All experimental protocols were approved by the Stanford University Institutional Review Board (protocol number 59740), the Cambridge Psychology Research Ethics Committee (application numbers PRE.2021.010, PRE.2021.065), and the Duke University Campus Institutional Review Board (protocol number 2021–0209). Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Consent for publication: Participants consented to their data being used for research publications.
Figures
References
-
- Bruns, R., Hosangadi, D., Trotochaud, M. & Sell, T. K. COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and disinformation costs and estimated $50 to $300 million each day. Tech. Rep. October (2021). URL https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/sites/default/files/2023-02/20211020....
-
- Myers, M. G. & Pineda, D. in Misinformation about Vaccines (eds Barrett, A. D. & Stanberry, L. R.) Vaccines for Biodefense and Emerging and Neglected Diseases Ch. 17, 255–270 (Academic Press, London, 2009).
-
- Allen, J., Watts, D. J. & Rand, D. G. Quantifying the impact of misinformation and vaccine-skeptical content on Facebook. Science384, eadk3451 (2024). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
