Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 18;15(1):30155.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15389-8.

A novel anoikis related gene prognostic model for colorectal cancer based on single cell sequencing and bulk transcriptome analyses

Affiliations

A novel anoikis related gene prognostic model for colorectal cancer based on single cell sequencing and bulk transcriptome analyses

Lei Yang et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a most deadly cancer, and effective prognostic biomarkers are urgently needed. Although anoikis has diverse regulatory roles in tumor progression, the impact of anoikis-related genes (ANRG) by single-cell and bulk transcriptome analyses on the prognostic value for CRC have not been studied. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with anoikis were obtained by performing single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis in cells with high and low ANRG expression and weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) in a bulk RNA sequencing dataset. Key prognostic genes were selected from anoikis associated DEGs by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis, and a prognostic model was established based on the risk score calculated from the expression levels of the identified key prognostic genes. A 10 anoikis-related-gene prognostic model (MGP, TPM2, CRIP2, TUBB6, C1orf54, NOTCH3, LTBP1, CSRP2, FSTL3, and VIM) was developed and the area under the curve (AUC) values of the model in predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year survival probabilities reached 0.744, 0.797, and 0.755, respectively. In conclusion, anoikis related genes could be promising prognostic factors for risk stratification of CRC patients.

Keywords: Anoikis; Colorectal cancer; Prognosis; Single cell sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analyses. a A t-SNE plot showing the division of cells into 31 clusters. b A t-SNE plot presenting the annotated 6 cell types from the 31 cell clusters. c A t-SNE plot of cellular compositions in the normal and tumor samples. d A heat map showing the marker genes used to annotate the 6 cell types. e A t-SNE plot illustrating the distribution of cells by the expression levels of anoikis related genes (ANRGs). f A t-SNE plot presenting the distribution of cells by ANRG expression in the normal and tumor samples.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Functional enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes between the two groups with high and low expression of ANRGs. a The top 5 kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes pathways enriched in the ANRG-high and ANRG-low groups. b The top 5 gene ontology biological processes enriched in the ANRG-high and ANRG-low groups. c The top 5 gene ontology cellular components enriched in the ANRG-high and ANRG-low groups. d The top 5 gene ontology molecular functions enriched in the ANRG-high and ANRG-low groups.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Weighted correlation network analysis and module-trait analyses. a Selection of the optimal soft threshold power. b Clustering dendrogram. c A heat map showing the correlations between modules and anoikis and cytotoxic T lymphocytes. d A venn plot showing the intersection of anoikis associated DEGs derived from scRNA-seq analysis and anoikis associated genes obtained from WGCNA.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Filtering of prognostic genes by univariate cox regression analysis. a A forest plot showing genes significantly associated with the prognosis of patients identified through univariate cox regression analysis. b A forest plot showing genes significantly associated with the prognosis of patients identified through multivariate cox regression analysis. c Expression levels of the identified prognostic genes in TCGA dataset.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Construction and evaluation of a prognostic model. a Lasso coefficient profiles of the most relevant prognostic genes (left panel) and ten-fold cross validation for tuning parameter selection in the Lasso model (right panel). b Survival curves showing the association between the risk score and the prognosis in TCGA dataset. c Receiver operating characteristic curves showing the predictive accuracy of the model in predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates in TCGA dataset. d Survival curves showing the association between the risk score and the prognosis in the GSE17536 dataset. e Receiver operating characteristic curves showing the predictive accuracy of the model in predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates in the GSE17536 dataset.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Identification of independent prognostic factors and establishing a nomogram. a A forest plot showing independent prognostic factors identified in univariate cox regression analysis. b A nomogram for predicting 5- and 3-year survival rates. The total point of a subject could be calculated by adding all the points assigned to each factor, and the subject’s risk could be determined by drawing a perpendicular line from the position of the total point to the probability axis.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Infiltrated immune cells and biological pathways enriched in samples with high FSTL3 expression. a A box plot showing the association between FSTL3 expression and tumor stage in TCGA dataset. b A box plot showing the association between FSTL3 expression and tumor stage in the GSE41258 dataset. c KEGG pathways enriched in samples with high FSTL3 expression. d Hallmark pathways enriched in samples with high FSTL3 expression. e The most significantly enriched Hallmark pathway in samples with high FSTL3 expression.

Similar articles

References

    1. Xi, Y. & Xu, P. Global colorectal cancer burden in 2020 and projections to 2040. Transl Oncol.14, 101174 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vuik, F. E. et al. Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in young adults in Europe over the last 25 years. Gut68, 1820–1826 (2019). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen, K., Collins, G., Wang, H. & Toh, J. W. T. Pathological features and prognostication in colorectal cancer. Curr. Oncol.28, 5356–5383 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gutierrez, A., Demond, H., Brebi, P. & Ili, C. G. Novel methylation biomarkers for colorectal cancer prognosis. Biomolecules11, 1722 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luo, X. J. et al. Novel genetic and epigenetic biomarkers of prognostic and predictive significance in stage II/III colorectal cancer. Mol. Ther.29, 587–596 (2021). - PMC - PubMed

Substances