Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 1:31:1612138.
doi: 10.3389/pore.2025.1612138. eCollection 2025.

Application of TRPS1 in ER-negative or low expression distant metastatic breast carcinoma

Affiliations

Application of TRPS1 in ER-negative or low expression distant metastatic breast carcinoma

Runze Zhang et al. Pathol Oncol Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: Traditional markers have various limitations in recognizing the breast origin of distant metastatic breast carcinoma (DMBC), especially in ER-negative or low expression cases. In recent years, TRPS1 has been reported as a breast marker with satisfactory sensitivity and specificity in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). We aimed to compare the expression of TRPS1, GATA3, and GCDFP-15 in ER-negative or low-ER-expressing DMBC, and to further evaluate the diagnostic value of TRPS1.

Methods: Immunohistochemical staining for TRPS1, GATA3, and GCDFP-15 was performed in 107 cases of ER-negative or low expression DMBC specimens. Nuclear staining was considered positive for TRPS1 and GATA3, and cytoplasmic staining was considered positive for GCDFP-15.

Results: The positive rates for TRPS1, GATA3, and GCDFP-15 were 90.65% (97/107), 91.59% (98/107), and 42.99% (46/107), respectively. There was no significant difference in the expression rate and intensity between the first two markers (p = 0.929), but both rates were significantly higher than that of GCDFP-15 (p < 0.05). Among these, 6 cases showed positive expression for TRPS1 while GATA3 and GCDFP-15 were negative; 8 cases showed positive expression for GATA3 while TRPS1 and GCDFP-15 were negative.

Conclusion: TRPS1 is as effective as GATA3 in confirming breast origin for ER-negative or low expression DMBC, and the two markers exhibit excellent complementary effects, both outperforming GCDFP-15. The combined application of TRPS1 and GATA3 is the optimal method to confirm that ER-negative or low-expression distant metastatic carcinoma originates from the breast.

Keywords: ER; GATA3; TRPS1; breast cancer; distant metastatic breast carcinomas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A right cervical lymph node biopsy (A) showed positive expression of TRPS1 (B), but negative expression of GATA3 (C) and GCDFP-15 (D).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Another case of right cervical lymph node biopsy (A) showed positive expression of GATA3 (C), but negative expression of TRPS1 (B) and GCDFP-15 (D).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The Venn diagram illustrates the expression patterns and interrelationships of GATA3, TRPS1, and GCDFP15 in all ER-negative or low-expressing DMBC. The three circles in the diagram represent the expression of GATA3 (red), TRPS1 (green), and GCDFP15 (blue), respectively.

References

    1. Shen T, Zhao J, Zhao M, Taggart MW, Ramalingam P, Gong Y, et al. Unusual staining of immunohistochemical markers PAX8 and CDX2 in breast carcinoma: a potential diagnostic pitfall. Hum Pathol (2022) 125(125):35–47. 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.04.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khazaeli Najafabadi M, Mirzaeian E, Memar Montazerin S, Tavangar AR, Tabary M, Tavangar SM. Role of GATA3 in tumor diagnosis: a review. Pathol Res Pract (2021) 226:153611. 10.1016/j.prp.2021.153611 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ab Halim SA, Lee SK, Mustangin M, Mohd Saleh MF, Shah SA, Md Isa N. Expression of oestrogen-α receptor in papillary thyroid carcinoma and its association with metastasis. The Malaysian J Pathol (2020) 42(3):415–22. - PubMed
    1. Castellanos MR, Fanous E, Thaker R, Flory MJ, Seetharamu N, Dhar M, et al. Expression patterns and clinical significance of estrogen receptor in non-small cell lung cancer. Pathol Res Pract (2023) 241:154298. 10.1016/j.prp.2022.154298 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gan X, Dai G, Li Y, Xu L, Liu G. Intricate roles of estrogen and estrogen receptors in digestive system cancers: a systematic review. Cancer Biol and Med (2024) 21(10):898–915. 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0224 - DOI - PMC - PubMed