Kratom use among ethnobotanical tea bar patrons in Colorado: Subjective drug effects, adverse reactions, and perceived benefits of use
- PMID: 40823326
- PMCID: PMC12355151
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100361
Kratom use among ethnobotanical tea bar patrons in Colorado: Subjective drug effects, adverse reactions, and perceived benefits of use
Abstract
Introduction: Kratom use is increasing in the US, yet data characterizing use patterns, risks, and benefits is limited. Additionally, there are few data on the acute subjective effects of kratom in humans, and no studies to-date have examined kratom use within US public consumption settings, which have become increasingly popular in recent years.
Methods: Using field methods, we administered surveys to 102 ethnobotanical tea bar patrons in northern Colorado. Surveys assessed demographic information, kratom use patterns, perceived benefits, and adverse reactions. We also assessed subjective drug effects acutely after participants consumed kratom at the bars. Data were analyzed using a mixed-methods approach.
Results: Participants (mean age=22.34 years, 39.2 % women), reported frequent kratom use (73.4 % endorsed weekly use, 19.3 % endorsed daily use). Reported benefits included mental and physical health benefits, social enhancement, and substance use harm reduction. Adverse reactions primarily involved gastrointestinal issues, though acute psychological effects (e.g., anxiety), and withdrawal symptoms were also cited. Kratom use in a bar setting was associated with acute stimulation and mild euphoria, and minimal sedation.
Conclusions: While most participants reported perceived benefits, the presence of adverse reactions highlight the need for more data on safety and risks of kratom use, particularly within public consumption spaces. Results also highlight the possible role of kratom in supporting substance use disorder recovery, with some ethnobotanical tea bars potentially functioning as recovery spaces.
Keywords: Mitragyna speciosa; ethnobotanical tea bars; field surveys; kratom; mixed methods.
© 2025 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Kirsten Smith reports a relationship with International Plant and Herbal Alliance that includes: consulting or advisory. Kirsten Smith reports a relationship with Kratom Coalition that includes: consulting or advisory. Co-author serves as an expert witness in legal cases involving kratom - KES If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD010204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27040448 Free PMC article.
-
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39593159 Free PMC article.
-
Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 24;4(4):CD011279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011279.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28436583 Free PMC article.
-
Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 14;1(1):CD011279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011279.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 24;4:CD011279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011279.pub3. PMID: 28087891 Free PMC article. Updated.
References
-
- American Kratom Association, 2019. Natural Kratom Products vs. Adulterated Kratom Products—Where the FDA Went Wrong [WWW Document]. URL https://www.csakratom.org/uploads/AKA_Natural_vs_Adulterated_Kratom_Prod... (accessed 11.17.24).
-
- Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res Psychol. 2006;3 doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. - DOI
-
- Cinosi E., Martinotti G., Simonato P., Singh D., Demetrovics Z., Roman-Urrestarazu A., Bersani F.S., Vicknasingam B., Piazzon G., Li J.H., Yu W.J., Kapitány-Fövény M., Farkas J., Di Giannantonio M., Corazza O. Following “the Roots” of Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa): the evolution of an enhancer from a traditional use to increase work and productivity in southeast asia to a recreational psychoactive drug in western countries. Biomed. Res Int. 2015;2015 doi: 10.1155/2015/968786. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources