Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;39(8):e70277.
doi: 10.1111/ctr.70277.

Combined Heart and Liver Transplantation: A Single Center Experience and Review of National Data

Affiliations

Combined Heart and Liver Transplantation: A Single Center Experience and Review of National Data

Amen Z Kiani et al. Clin Transplant. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is a high-risk procedure that is infrequently performed in select patients with end-stage heart and liver disease. This study details a single center experience with simultaneous (en bloc or sequential) CHLT.

Methods: This is a single center retrospective review of 12 simultaneous CHLT performed over a 12-year period. Studied variables included basic clinical data, intraoperative and postoperative details, and outcomes. A comparison of our outcomes to the national cohort was also performed using the UNOS registry.

Results: Twelve CHLTs (five pediatric, seven adult) were performed between 2011 and 2023. Mean age was 32 years (range 7-62 years, 75% male). Congenital heart disease with cardiac cirrhosis (58%) and amyloidosis (25%) were the most common indications. Liver and heart wait list times were 125 and 116 days, respectively. The majority of CHLTs were performed en-bloc (n = 8; 67%) and four (33%) were performed sequentially (liver following heart). Mean post-operative ICU and total length of stay (LOS) were 16 and 28 days, respectively, with six patients requiring unplanned return to OR (three for hemoperitoneum, three for hemopericardium). There were no intraoperative deaths, and one patient died on POD 1 from hyperacute rejection. None of the patients required re-transplant after a median follow-up of 37.5 months. Both overall and graft survival for the cohort at 1-, 3-, and 5-years remained 92%.

Conclusion: CHLT remains the only viable option for carefully selected patients with end-stage heart and liver failure and is associated with excellent patient outcomes.

Keywords: combined; heart transplant; liver transplant; national data; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. T. E. Starzl, D. W. Bilheimer, H. T. Bahnson, et al., “Heart‐Liver Transplantation in a Patient With Familial Hypercholesterolaemia,” Lancet 1, no. 8391 (1984): 1382–1383, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140‐6736(84)91876‐2.
    1. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov.
    1. K. M. Tracy, L. K. Matsuoka, and S. P. Alexopoulos, “Update on Combined Heart and Liver Transplantation: Evolving Patient Selection, Improving Outcomes, and Outstanding Questions,” Current Opinions in Organ Transplantation 28, no. 2 (2023): 104–109, https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001041.
    1. S. P. Alexopoulos, W. K. Wu, I. A. Ziogas, et al., “Adult Combined Heart‐Liver Transplantation: The United States Experience,” Transplant International 35 (2022): 10036, https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2021.10036.
    1. R. Bryant3rd, R. Rizwan, F. Zafar, et al., “Contemporary Outcomes of Combined Heart‐Liver Transplant in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease,” Transplantation 102, no. 2 (2018): e67–e73, https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001978.

LinkOut - more resources