Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 18;13(1):85.
doi: 10.1186/s40635-025-00793-1.

Non-mechanical haemodynamic support in acute pulmonary thromboembolism: a scoping review

Affiliations
Review

Non-mechanical haemodynamic support in acute pulmonary thromboembolism: a scoping review

W Body et al. Intensive Care Med Exp. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) may require haemodynamic supportive therapies while appropriate therapies for clot burden reduction are pursued. This scoping review aims to identify the non-mechanical haemodynamic support interventions that have been investigated for the management of acute PE, and to map the available evidence for each intervention.

Methods: An iterative search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library was performed to map all available animal studies, case-series, observational studies, human trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses that investigate any non-mechanical haemodynamic support in acute PE.

Results: 6,362 unique articles were screened and of the 132 studies that met the eligibility criteria, 98 were animal studies, 31 human studies, and 3 were systematic reviews. Among all studies 57 different agents were found, including 16 among the human studies. 6 agents were investigated across 7 human randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and included inhaled nitric oxide, fluid, furosemide, diclofenac, sildenafil, and epoprostenol, but were limited to intermediate-risk PE and none demonstrated a mortality benefit from the intervention tested.

Conclusion: The evidence to guide clinical practice in the non-mechanical haemodynamic support of PE is severely limited. However, there are numerous candidate agents that could be further investigated. The high-risk group are an understudied population.

Keywords: Afterload; Haemodynamic support; Inotropy; Preload; Pulmonary embolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram

Similar articles

References

    1. Vinay Kumar AA, Aster J (2021) Hemodynamic disorders, thromboembolic disease, and shock. In: Vinay Kumar AA, Aster J (eds) Robins & Cotran pathologic basis of disease. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 115–139
    1. Lyhne MD et al (2020) Pulmonary vasodilation in acute pulmonary embolism - a systematic review. Pulm Circ 10(1):2045894019899775 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Konstantinides SV et al (2020) 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J 41(4):543–603 - PubMed
    1. Piazza G (2020) Advanced management of intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism: JACC focus seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol 76(18):2117–2127 - PubMed
    1. Sifuentes AA et al (2023) Mechanical circulatory support and critical care management of high-risk acute pulmonary embolism. Interv Cardiol Clin 12(3):323–338 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources