Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 18.
doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01287-9. Online ahead of print.

Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma in acute care settings: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma in acute care settings: a systematic review

Niamh A Merriman et al. Eur Geriatr Med. .

Abstract

Purpose: Neurocognitive disorders (NCDs), including delirium, cognitive impairment, or dementia, are prevalent in older patients with physical trauma in acute care settings. Identifying NCDs in these patients can enhance care decisions to improve outcomes. This study aimed to identify the diagnostic accuracy of screening tools for NCDs in older patients with trauma in acute care settings.

Methods: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to 01 March 2024. Inclusion criteria were: older adults (≥ 60 years); admitted to acute care setting following physical trauma; diagnostic accuracy study of a screening tool for (1) delirium and/or (2) cognitive impairment or dementia against a reference standard of a clinical diagnosis (standard diagnostic criteria or validated tool). Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Methodological heterogeneity between the studies precluded meta-analysis.

Results: Five studies examining five different screening tools for delirium in older adults, all with hip fracture, were included. Studies reported wide variance in sensitivity (76.9-91.8) and specificity (54.5-99). Prevalence of detected delirium varied widely across studies (6.7-31.5%). All studies had a high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. No studies were found to examine the diagnostic accuracy of screening tools for cognitive impairment in older patients with trauma.

Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the dearth of studies validating screening tools for NCDs in older patients following trauma in acute care settings.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024518730.

Keywords: Cognition; Delirium; Diagnostic accuracy; Hip fracture; Older adults; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. Ethics approval: Ethical approval and written consent were not required.

References

    1. Government of Ireland. A Trauma System for Ireland: Report of the Trauma Steering Group. [Internet]. Ireland. 2018. https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/c8640e-a-trauma-system-for-ireland-rep... . Accessed 29 March 2024.
    1. National Office of Clinical Audit. Major Trauma Audit National Report 2021 [Internet]. Dublin, Ireland. National Office of Clinical Audit. 2023. https://www.noca.ie/documents/major-trauma-audit-national-report-2021/ . Accessed 2 February 2025.
    1. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC
    1. World Health Organization. WHO Dementia Factsheet [Internet]. Geneva. World Health Organization. 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia . Accessed 19 February 2025.
    1. Fogg C, Griffiths P, Meredith P, Bridges J (2018) Hospital outcomes of older people with cognitive impairment: an integrative review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 33(9):1177–1197. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4919 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources