Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 18;23(1):104.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01365-1.

The benefits for health care staff of involvement in applied health research: a scoping review

Affiliations
Review

The benefits for health care staff of involvement in applied health research: a scoping review

Andria Hanbury et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: Initiatives are increasingly encouraging health and social care staff involvement in research, with evidence for patient and organisational level benefits. There is less evidence of the benefits for staff and whether this varies by type of involvement. This scoping review aimed to identify the different ways staff are involved in applied health research, the benefits experienced, and whether this varies by type of involvement. This will help to inform leaders in service organisations, funders, and researchers about how to maximise such benefits.

Methods: The scoping review followed the JBI methodology. Four databases were searched: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Scopus. Grey literature was identified via Google, Google Scholar and relevant websites. Records had to be UK-based, published in English between 2003 and 2023 and cover applied health and care research, health care staff involvement and report on benefits. Text was extracted from records, coded afterwards, and quality checked. The benefits were distilled by four research active health care staff. Descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis were used to report the results.

Findings: In total, 49 records were reviewed, 42 records were from the database search and 7 from the grey literature search. Records were most commonly journal articles (n = 44), covering multiple care settings (n = 15) and mixed professional groups (n = 24), used qualitative methods (n = 22) and focussed on clinical academic roles (n = 21). Six benefits of involvement in research were distilled: personal fulfilment, general competencies/skills, connections/networks, opportunities for learning, opportunities for leading improvements in practice, and using evidence more effectively. Records that focussed on the more intensive clinical academic roles reported more examples of opportunities for leading improvements in practice, and the building of connections and social support. Non-clinical academic records more frequently reported that involvement in research provided opportunities for learning.

Conclusions: These findings support efforts to involve staff in research, with a range of benefits associated with enhanced job satisfaction, even when research involvement is in a less intense form, such as participation in a study. These findings can be used to encourage involvement, with recommendations for future research to review the benefits for social care staff, and to examine more directly the effect on staff wellbeing and retention.

Keywords: Benefits; Health care staff; Research involvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable (review). Consent to participate: Not applicable (review). Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA diagram

Similar articles

References

    1. Bekkers MJ, Simpson SA, Dunstan F, Hood K, Hare M, Evans J, Butler CC, STAR Study Team. Enhancing the quality of antibiotic prescribing in primary care: qualitative evaluation of a blended learning intervention. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell C, Colleran V. Empowering nurses, midwives, and allied health professionals to gain an academic, research and quality improvement experience within clinical practice. Int J Pract Based Learn Health Soc care. 2019;7(2):69–79.
    1. Boase S, Kim Y, Craven A, Cohn S. Involving practice nurses in primary care research: the experience of multiple and competing demands. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68:590–9. - PubMed
    1. Boaz A, Hanney S, Jones T, Soper B. Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: a three-stage review. BMJ Open. 2015. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009415. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boaz A, Goodenough B, Hanney S, Soper B. If health organisations and staff engage in research, does healthcare improve? Strengthening the evidence base through systematic reviews. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024;22(1):113. 10.1186/s12961-024-01187-7. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources