Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;55(4):e70039.
doi: 10.1111/sltb.70039.

Rates and Reasons for Concealing Suicidal Ideation From Clinicians: A Cross-National Examination

Affiliations

Rates and Reasons for Concealing Suicidal Ideation From Clinicians: A Cross-National Examination

Devon Peterkin et al. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Nondisclosure of suicidal ideation (SI) presents a challenge to assessing suicide risk, as assessments often rely on self-reported SI. Cross-national comparisons of rates of, and reasons for, SI nondisclosure remain understudied. The present study examined whether rates of SI nondisclosure from clinicians differed, and if there were differences in rates of reasons for SI nondisclosure, across 12 countries.

Method: A subset of adult participants (n = 6770) who reported a lifetime history of SI from 12 countries responded to the question: "Have you ever denied or concealed thinking about suicide from a doctor or clinician?" Those who selected "Yes" provided reason(s) for SI nondisclosure. Responses were coded according to inductively and deductively derived reasons for SI nondisclosure.

Results: Rates of nondisclosure among participants who reported lifetime SI ranged from 7.2% (Taiwan) to 48.2% (United States). Among those participants, rates of reasons for SI nondisclosure ranged from 2.0% (participant was unsure/did not know why they concealed SI) to 35.6% (negative internal experiences).

Conclusions: Findings provide insight into the frequency of and reasons for SI nondisclosure from clinicians at a country-specific level. Results could serve as a rationale for clinicians to incorporate indirect suicide risk factors into risk assessments.

Keywords: concealment; cross‐national; nondisclosure; suicidal ideation; suicide.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahn, L. H., S. E. Yee, K. M. Dixon, C. A. Kase, R. Sharma, and C. E. Hill. 2021. “Feeling Offended by Clients: The Experiences of Doctoral Student Therapists.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 68, no. 2: 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000511.
    1. An, S., H. Lee, J. Lee, and S. Kang. 2022. “Social Stigma of Suicide in South Korea: A Cultural Perspective.” Death Studies 47, no. 3: 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2022.2051096.
    1. Anestis, M. D., and B. A. Green. 2015. “The Impact of Varying Levels of Confidentiality on Disclosure on Suicidal Thoughts in a Sample of United States National Guard Personnel.” Journal of Clinical Psychology 71, no. 10: 1023–1030. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22198.
    1. Barzilay, S., K. Assounga, J. Veras, C. Beaubian, S. Bloch‐Elkouby, and I. Galynker. 2020. “Assessment of Near‐Term Risk for Suicide Attempts Using the Suicide Crisis Inventory.” Journal of Affective Disorders 276: 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.053.
    1. Berman, A. L. 2018. “Risk Factors Proximate to Suicide and Suicide Risk Assessment in the Context of Denied Suicide Ideation.” Suicide and Life‐Threatening Behavior 48, no. 3: 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12351.

LinkOut - more resources